iPadOS 26 is here — how to download the developer beta now
iPadOS 26 is slated to arrive this fall, and once it's here, it promises to bring a slew of updates for the best iPads capable of running the new software.
You'll see the difference right from the jump, as iPadOS 26 will utilize the same Liquid Glass design language coming to all of Apple's software platforms. A new windowing system designed for iPads allows you to move and resize apps to your liking. Those apps should be more useful since they will communicate better with one another thanks to Apple Intelligence.
While we'll have to wait until the fall for the full release, you can get started with iPadOS 26 right now by downloading the developer beta, which Apple released at WWDC 2025 yesterday (June 9). However, keep in mind that the developer beta might contain bugs that could negatively affect your iPad, so proceed with caution.
If you don't want to put your iPad at risk but still want to check out iPadOS 26, you can wait for the (safer) public beta that should arrive in July. But if you're still feeling up to it, here's how to download the iPadOS 26 developer beta.
Before moving forward, you need to know if iPadOS 26 is compatible with your iPad. Here's a list of all compatible iPads.
Of the tablets capable of running the current iPadOS 18, only the 7th generation iPad has lost support with this update.
Before you install the beta, make sure to back up your iPad, just in case anything goes wrong and you need to return to iPadOS 18.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
First, head to beta.apple.com and sign up for the beta software program.
Launch the Settings app and tap General, followed by Software Update.
If you have the latest version of iPadOS, the iPadOS 26 developer beta may already be waiting for you. If not, tap Beta Updates and select the iPadOS 26 Developer Beta from the list.
Select either Update Now, which will start the beta downloading right away, or Update Tonight, which will delay the beta until later. You'll be prompted to enter your passcode, and if you've selected Update Now, the download will commence. Downloading betas can take a while, so make sure your iPad has enough power or is attached to a charger when you're downloading the iPadOS 26 beta.
Once you've downloaded the beta, you'll be prompted to either install it now or wait until later. When installation is done, your iPad will restart. After you enter your passcode, iPadOS 26 will be installed and ready to test. The download could take a while.
And that's how you download the iPadOS 26 developer beta! Again, if you're worried that this developer beta could introduce bugs or other performance issues, you can wait for the public beta to arrive in July.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
24 minutes ago
- Associated Press
INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Apple Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit
SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jun 23, 2025-- Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) securities between June 10, 2024 and June 9, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'), have until August 19, 2025 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Apple class action lawsuit. Captioned Tucker v. Apple Inc., No. 25-cv-05197 (N.D. Cal.), the Apple class action lawsuit charges Apple and certain of Apple's top current and former executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Apple class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: You can also contact attorneysJ.C. SanchezorJennifer N. Caringalof Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at[email protected]. CASE ALLEGATIONS: The Apple class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Apple misstated the time it would take to integrate the advanced artificial intelligence ('AI')-based Siri features into its devices; (ii) accordingly, it was highly unlikely that these features would be available for the iPhone 16; (iii) the lack of such advanced AI-based features would hurt iPhone 16 sales; and (iv) as a result, Apple's business and/or financial prospects were overstated. The Apple class action lawsuit further alleges that on March 7, 2025, Apple announced it was indefinitely delaying promised updates to its Siri digital assistant. The Apple class action lawsuit alleges that on this news, the price of Apple stock fell. Then, on March 12, 2025, the Apple class action lawsuit further alleges that Morgan Stanley published a report in which analyst Erik Woodring lowered his price target on Apple from $275 to $252, asserting that the delay in introducing advanced Siri features would impact iPhone upgrade cycles throughout 2025 and 2026, and presenting evidence that roughly 50% of iPhone owners who did not upgrade to the iPhone 16 attributed their decision to such delays. On this news, the price of Apple stock fell further, according to the complaint. Thereafter, the Apple class action lawsuit alleges that on April 3, 2025, the Wall Street Journal published an article titled 'Apple and Amazon Promised Us Revolutionary AI. We're Still Waiting,' which stated, in relevant part, that '[w]ith 'more personal' Siri . . . , the tech giant[] marketed features [it] ha[s] yet to deliver,' and suggested that while 'this is challenging technology and the cost of getting it wrong is devastatingly high, especially for [a] compan[y] like Apple . . . that must build trust with customers,' 'the same responsibility applies to marketing: They shouldn't announce products until they're sure they can deliver them.' On this news, the price of Apple stock fell more than 7%, according to the complaint. Finally, on June 9, 2025, Apple hosted its Worldwide Developer Conference ('WWDC'), almost one year to the day after first announcing the suite of supposedly forthcoming Apple Intelligence features at the 2024 WWDC, and Apple failed to announce any new updates regarding advanced Siri features, according to the complaint. On this news, the price of Apple stock fell further, according to the complaint. Last year, Robbins Geller secured a $490 million recovery in a securities fraud class action case alleging Apple CEO Timothy Cook made false and misleading statements to investors – the third-largest securities class action recovery ever in the Northern District of California and the fifth-largest such recovery ever in the Ninth Circuit. In the order granting final approval of the settlement, the court recognized the 'skill and strategic vision, as well as the risk taken by [Robbins Geller]' in securing the sizeable recovery while efficiently managing the 'uniquely complex' aspects of the case against 'highly sophisticated and experienced counsel and defendants.' Learn more by clicking here. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Apple securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Apple class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Apple class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Apple class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Apple class action lawsuit. ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices. View source version on CONTACT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP J.C. Sanchez, Jennifer N. Caringal 655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101 800-449-4900 [email protected] KEYWORD: UNITED STATES NORTH AMERICA CALIFORNIA INDUSTRY KEYWORD: CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SOURCE: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Copyright Business Wire 2025. PUB: 06/23/2025 05:25 AM/DISC: 06/23/2025 05:24 AM
Forbes
26 minutes ago
- Forbes
Six Ways To Advance Modern Architecture For AI Systems
View of the clouds reflected in the curve glass office building. 3d rendering These days, many engineering teams are coming up against a common problem – basically speaking, the models are too big. This problem comes in various forms, but there's often a connecting thread and a commonality to the challenges. Project are running up against memory constraints. As parameters range into the billions and trillions, data centers have to keep up. Stakeholders have to look out for thresholds in vendor services. Cost is generally an issue. However, there are new technologies on the horizon that can take that memory footprint and compute burden, and reduce them to something more manageable. How are today's innovators doing this? Let's take a look. Input and Data Compression First of all, there is the compression of inputs. You can design a loss algorithm to compress the model, and even run a compressed model versus the full one; compression methodologies are saving space when it comes to specialized neural network function. Here's a snippet from a paper posted at Apple's Machine Learning Research resource: 'Recently, several works have shown significant success in training-free and data-free compression (pruning and quantization) of LLMs achieving 50-60% sparsity and reducing the bit-width down to 3 or 4 bits per weight, with negligible perplexity degradation over the uncompressed baseline.' That's one example of how this can work. This Microsoft document looks at prompt compression, another component of looking at how to shrink or reduce data in systems. The Sparsity Approach: Focus and Variation Sometimes you can carve away part of the system design, in order to save resources. Think about a model where all of the attention areas work the same way. But maybe some of the input area is basically white space, where the rest of it is complex and relevant. Should the model's coverage be homogenous or one-size-fits-all? You're spending the same amount of compute on high and low attention areas. Alternately, people engineering the systems can remove the tokens that don't get a lot of attention, based on what's important and what's not. Now in this part of the effort, you're seeing hardware advances as well. More specialized GPU and multicore processors can have an advantage when it comes to this kind of differentiation, so take a look at everything that makers are doing to usher in a whole new class of GPU gear. Changing Context Strings Another major problem with network size is related to the context windows that systems use. If they are typical large language systems operating on a sequence, the length of that sequence is important. Context means more of certain kinds of functionality, but it also requires more resources. By changing the context, you change the 'appetite' of the system. Here's a bit from the above resource on prompt compression: 'While longer prompts hold considerable potential, they also introduce a host of issues, such as the need to exceed the chat window's maximum limit, a reduced capacity for retaining contextual information, and an increase in API costs, both in monetary terms and computational resources.' Directly after that, the authors go into solutions that might have broad application, in theory, to different kinds of fixes. Dynamic Models and Strong Inference Here are two more big trends right now: one is the emergence of strong inference systems, where the machine teaches itself what to do over time based on its past experience. Another is dynamic systems, where the input weights and everything else changes over time, rather than remaining the same. Both of these have some amount of promise, as well, for helping to match the design and engineering needs that people have when they're building the systems. There's also the diffusion model where you add noise, analyze, and remove that noise to come up with a new generative result. We talked about this last week in a post about the best ways to pursue AI. Last, but not least, we can evaluate traditional systems such as digital twinning. Twinning is great for precise simulations, but it takes a lot of resources – if there's a better way to do something, you might be able to save a lot of compute that way. These are just some of the solutions that we've been hearing about and they dovetail with the idea of edge computing, where you're doing more on an endpoint device at the edge of a network. Microcontrollers and small components can be a new way to crunch data without sending it through the cloud to some centralized location. Think about all of these advances as we sit through more of what people are doing these days with AI.
Business Wire
37 minutes ago
- Business Wire
INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Apple Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit
SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Apple class action lawsuit. Captioned Tucker v. Apple Inc., No. 25-cv-05197 (N.D. Cal.), the Apple class action lawsuit charges Apple and certain of Apple's top current and former executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Apple class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: CASE ALLEGATIONS: The Apple class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Apple misstated the time it would take to integrate the advanced artificial intelligence ('AI')-based Siri features into its devices; (ii) accordingly, it was highly unlikely that these features would be available for the iPhone 16; (iii) the lack of such advanced AI-based features would hurt iPhone 16 sales; and (iv) as a result, Apple's business and/or financial prospects were overstated. The Apple class action lawsuit further alleges that on March 7, 2025, Apple announced it was indefinitely delaying promised updates to its Siri digital assistant. The Apple class action lawsuit alleges that on this news, the price of Apple stock fell. Then, on March 12, 2025, the Apple class action lawsuit further alleges that Morgan Stanley published a report in which analyst Erik Woodring lowered his price target on Apple from $275 to $252, asserting that the delay in introducing advanced Siri features would impact iPhone upgrade cycles throughout 2025 and 2026, and presenting evidence that roughly 50% of iPhone owners who did not upgrade to the iPhone 16 attributed their decision to such delays. On this news, the price of Apple stock fell further, according to the complaint. Thereafter, the Apple class action lawsuit alleges that on April 3, 2025, the Wall Street Journal published an article titled 'Apple and Amazon Promised Us Revolutionary AI. We're Still Waiting,' which stated, in relevant part, that '[w]ith 'more personal' Siri . . . , the tech giant[] marketed features [it] ha[s] yet to deliver,' and suggested that while 'this is challenging technology and the cost of getting it wrong is devastatingly high, especially for [a] compan[y] like Apple . . . that must build trust with customers,' 'the same responsibility applies to marketing: They shouldn't announce products until they're sure they can deliver them.' On this news, the price of Apple stock fell more than 7%, according to the complaint. Finally, on June 9, 2025, Apple hosted its Worldwide Developer Conference ('WWDC'), almost one year to the day after first announcing the suite of supposedly forthcoming Apple Intelligence features at the 2024 WWDC, and Apple failed to announce any new updates regarding advanced Siri features, according to the complaint. On this news, the price of Apple stock fell further, according to the complaint. Last year, Robbins Geller secured a $490 million recovery in a securities fraud class action case alleging Apple CEO Timothy Cook made false and misleading statements to investors – the third-largest securities class action recovery ever in the Northern District of California and the fifth-largest such recovery ever in the Ninth Circuit. In the order granting final approval of the settlement, the court recognized the 'skill and strategic vision, as well as the risk taken by [Robbins Geller]' in securing the sizeable recovery while efficiently managing the 'uniquely complex' aspects of the case against 'highly sophisticated and experienced counsel and defendants.' Learn more by clicking here. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Apple securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Apple class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Apple class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Apple class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Apple class action lawsuit. ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information:
