Irish stock market closes at fresh all-time high
Despite retail stocks weighing down the market, European stocks were little changed on Wednesday. General stocks gains limited the losses as investors reacted to changes in US taxation policies.
The pan-European STOXX 600 closed slightly lower, down 0.8 per cent, as Dublin saw a marginal day of trading.
Dublin
While fallers outnumbered risers, the Iseq All-Share index ended the session slightly up 25.31 or 0.22 per cent from its previous close, at 11,399.48, its highest ever close.
There was a mixed performance in the banking sector. Bank of Ireland rose 0.89 per cent to €11.995, following on from a strong performance on Tuesday. Fellow banking stocks, Permanent TSB dropped 0.58 per cent and AIB Group fell 0.45 per cent.
Defensive stocks also had a mixed day of trading. While Kerry Group added 0.67 per cent, rising to a share price of €97.35, fellow dairy giant Glanbia fell 0.24 per cent. Healthcare services group Uniphar saw a 1 per cent fall in its share price.
Ryanair, which rose 5 per cent after publishing financial results on Monday, saw a third consecutive rise this week adding 0.63 per cent, reaching €23.85 per share.
London
The FTSE 100 was nearly flat with a 0.06 per cent gain, while the midcap FTSE 250 fell 0.7 per cent, as the inflation data triggered a slight wobble on the more domestically-focused index.
Among blue-chips, sportswear retailer JD Sports' shares were the worst hit, dropping 10.6 per cent after it warned that President Donald Trump's tariffs may force the company to hike prices in the key market.
SSE fell 2.4 per cent after the renewable energy generator cut its five-year investment plans by 15 per cent.
Keeping losses in check, precious metal miners gained 3 per cent as gold prices rose for a third straight session and hit a one-week high.
Fresnillo gained the most in the FTSE 100 with 4.2 per cent rise.
Water utility Severn Trent shares gained 2.3 per cent after it projected a doubling of adjusted earnings per share between 2025 to 2028.
Europe
The European benchmark shed 0.8 per cent amid declines in luxury and retail stocks.
JD Sports fell 10.6 per cent to the bottom of the STOXX 600 after posting a 2 per cent drop in first-quarter underlying sales and warned that higher prices in its key U.S. market could hit customer demand.
LVMH, Hermes and Kering among others fell over 2 per cent after luxury group Chanel reported a 4.3 per cent drop in its comparable yearly sales.
Tech shares helped to outweigh these losses, German chipmaker Infineon's 2.3 per cent gain after it said it would work with Nvidia to develop chips for new power delivery systems inside artificial intelligence data centres provided a boost to the sector.
The STOXX 600, however, has recovered from its April slump, and is trading less than 3 per cent away from its all-time highs.
An index tracking defence stocks was up 0.5 per cent after Trump selected a design for the $175 billion Golden Dome missile defence shield on Tuesday.
Morgan Stanley raised its view on the European banking sector to 'attractive', citing better earnings potential from continued yield steepening. The European banks index is among the top performing sectors this year. Read More The Growing Allure of the Eurovision Song Contest to Brands
Swiss bank Julius Baer slid 4.9 per cent after reporting a 130 million Swiss franc ($156.4 million) charge from a credit portfolio review and replacing its chief risk officer.
New York
In a volatile session on Wall Street, the S & P500 had slipped with Treasury yields rising in reaction to the US President Donald Trump's proposed tax-cut law during mid afternoon trading.
Boosting the Nasdaq, Google-parent Alphabet recorded a jump, while Nvidia and Meta Platforms climbed saw stocks rise slightly.
Nine of the 11 S&P sub-sectors traded lower, with Healthcare being the worst hit.
UnitedHealth Group saw its shares fall, following a Guardian report said the healthcare conglomerate secretly paid nursing homes thousands in bonuses to help reduce hospital transfers for ailing residents. HSBC also downgraded the stock to 'reduce' from 'hold'.
In earnings, retailer Target fell after slashing its annual forecast due to a pullback in discretionary spending.
Wolfspeed had lost nearly 70 per cent during mid afternoon trading following a report that the semiconductor supplier was preparing to file for bankruptcy within weeks.
Despite the losses, U.S. stocks have had a solid month so far. The S&P 500 has climbed more than 17 per cent from its April lows, when Trump's reciprocal tariffs roiled global markets.
On the back of bitcoin recording a fresh all-time high of $109,481.83 (€96,460.61) during the session, exchange operator Coinbase gained alongside crypto miners such as Riot Platforms. – Additional reporting by Reuters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UnitedHealth Group (NYSE:UNH) Announces Debt Financing Totalling US$3 Billion
UnitedHealth Group recently completed a substantial debt financing deal, raising $3 billion through the issuance of various Notes. This move comes amid a period of legal settlements, such as the $69 million ERISA case, and operational restructuring, including exploring bids for its Latin American operations. Despite these significant developments, the company's stock price remained relatively flat over the last month, reflecting broader market trends which also showed minimal movement. The dividend increase and shareholder discussions on executive compensation may have subtly influenced sentiment, but overall, these events seemed to align with the market's flat performance. UnitedHealth Group has 1 possible red flag we think you should know about. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 22 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. UnitedHealth Group's recent $3 billion debt financing and restructuring efforts, such as evaluating bids for its Latin American operations, are significant developments. While the near-term stock price remained relatively stable amid these changes, over the past five years, the company's total shareholder return, including dividends, was 13.61%. This reflects a steady growth trajectory, although in the last year, UnitedHealth underperformed the US Healthcare industry. The current share price sees a slight discount from the analyst consensus price target of $547.65, which is 28% higher than the present value. Despite recent legal settlements and compensation discussions, the company's aggressive push towards digital tools and Medicare adjustments might bolster future earnings and revenue. UnitedHealth's projected earnings per share and revenue growth is positioned slightly behind broader market expectations over the next few years, yet planned improvements in operational efficiencies could bridge this gap over time. Learn about UnitedHealth Group's future growth trajectory here. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NYSE:UNH. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Teradyne (NasdaqGS:TER) Revamps By-Laws to Modernize Shareholder Procedures and Director Elections
On June 20, 2025, Teradyne implemented significant amendments to its By-Laws, adjusting nomination and proposal notice windows and clarifying voting standards. Over the past month, Teradyne's stock price moved 9% amid these changes, potentially reflecting investor confidence in enhanced governance practices. Although the broader market has remained flat, the recent gains by the company could suggest that these internal updates resonated positively with market participants, aligning with an overall upward market trend over the past year. This internal shift may have added weight to Teradyne's modest divergence from the market's flat performance. Buy, Hold or Sell Teradyne? View our complete analysis and fair value estimate and you decide. These 17 companies survived and thrived after COVID and have the right ingredients to survive Trump's tariffs. Discover why before your portfolio feels the trade war pinch. The recent amendments to Teradyne's by-laws could potentially reinforce investor confidence, aligning with broader market interests in strong governance. Over a longer five-year span, Teradyne's total shareholder return of 7.61% provides context for its performance, despite the stock's short-term fluctuations. This return contrasts with the company's one-year underperformance, as it lagged behind both the overall US market and the semiconductor industry, indicating room for improvement. The governance changes could influence Teradyne's revenue and earnings positively, particularly in the context of its strategic focus on AI, robotics, and automation. These areas are anticipated to boost revenue, though current geopolitical and tariff concerns could pose risks. Analysts forecast an annual revenue growth of 12.3% and a rise in profit margins to 24.7%, indicating a potential upside, even if challenges persist. The recent share price movement following the changes, while reflective of immediate investor sentiment, shows a notable gap against the consensus price target of US$99.83, which represents a 25.8% potential increase from the current US$74.07. This suggests that investors might be weighing the company's long-term strategic initiatives against current uncertainties. Our valuation report unveils the possibility Teradyne's shares may be trading at a discount. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NasdaqGS:TER. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Electric vehicle (EV) tax breaks may hit a dead end under Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
If you're considering buying an electric vehicle, now may be the time to act. A sweeping Republican-led proposal, referred to as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' is charging through Congress and threatens to wipe out the popular electric vehicle (EV) tax credit for most vehicles in 2025. The credit was originally launched in 2008, but received a major overhaul under former President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. That legislation supercharged incentives, expanding the $7,500 credit for new EVs and rolling out a $4,000 credit for used electric vehicles. 'The purpose of the tax incentives was simply to spur EV adoption by giving a literal 'incentive' for people to buy EVs,' says Dave Thomas, director of content marketing and automotive industry analyst at CDK Global, a technology firm serving car dealerships. However, President Donald Trump and other Republicans have vowed to eliminate the credit, but analysts say the tax credit has been a driving force behind the EV boom. According to J.D. Power's E-Vision Intelligence Report, 87 percent of EV shoppers in 2024 took advantage of the tax credit — many citing it as a key reason for their purchase. That momentum could stall if the bill clears the Senate and makes its way to the president's desk. Here's what's at stake under the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' Learn more: Should you buy an electric car? How to decide in 2025 Under the current law, which covers cars purchased in 2023 or later, taxpayers can claim the electric vehicle tax credit if they meet specific income and purchase requirements. For new electric vehicles, you may qualify for a credit of up to $7,500, as long as the vehicle is primarily used in the United States. To be eligible, your modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) must fall below the following limits: $300,000 for married couples filing jointly or a surviving spouse $225,000 for head of household filers $150,000 for all other filers The IRS allows taxpayers to apply the income limit based on the year they take possession of the vehicle or the prior year — whichever is more favorable. For used electric vehicles purchased in 2023 or later, the credit is worth up to $4,000 or 30 percent of the purchase price, whichever is less. The vehicle's purchase price must not exceed $25,000, and you must buy the car from a licensed dealer. Also, the car must be at least two years old when you purchase it; for example, if you bought the car in 2025, it would have to be a 2023 model or older to qualify for the credit. Used EVs have lower income limitations than newer EVs as follows: $150,000 for married couples filing jointly or a surviving spouse $112,500 for head of household filers $75,000 for all other filers Another benefit: You can receive the credit at the time of the purchase instead of waiting until tax time to claim it, by transferring the tax credit to the dealer. If you choose this option at the dealership, you must still meet all the IRS requirements when filing your tax return. Learn more: 10 easy tax deductions and credits to cut your tax bill Much like the House-approved tax bill, the Senate proposal seeks to eliminate the electric vehicle tax credit for both new and used vehicles. But the Senate's timeline moves even faster. Here's how the two versions compare: House version Senate version Value of tax credit $0 for all EVs $0 for all EVs Expiration date End of 2025 for most EVs 180 days after bill becomes law for new EVs90 days after bill becomes law for used EVs New federal annual fee for EV owners $250 for EVs $100 for hybrids $0 The main difference between the House-approved bill and the Senate's version is how quickly the EV tax credit would end. Under the Senate's proposal, the $7,500 tax credit for new electric vehicles would expire 180 days after the bill becomes law. The $4,000 credit for used EVs would phase out even sooner — just 90 days after enactment. By contrast, the House bill would end the EV tax credit for most vehicles at the end of 2025. However, some vehicles could still qualify through the end of 2026. Plus, the House version includes a manufacturer-based phaseout. Automakers that have sold fewer than 200,000 EVs could still offer the credit until the end of 2026. 'So, Tesla for example will not have any incentives on its vehicles after the bill passes,' Thomas says. 'It will likely be hard for car shoppers to track this in real-time, and they will have to rely on research or their local car dealer to keep on top of it.' MORE: New charitable giving tax deduction worth up to $2,000 may be on way for millions While the House-approved bill includes a $250 annual fee, the Senate's version omits any mention of an annual EV charge. The House's proposed fee for electric vehicle owners is a measure aimed at ensuring all drivers contribute equally to maintaining the nation's roadways. Currently, owners of gas-powered cars help fund highway infrastructure through the 18.4 cents per gallon federal gas tax. But that tax has remained unchanged since 1993, even as the cost of maintaining roadways has skyrocketed. Plus, cars have become more fuel-efficient — and some drivers have switched to electric cars. But some experts argue the proposed $250 EV fee is excessive. The proposed fee would be nearly three times what the average driver pays annually in gas taxes, according to a Consumer Reports study. 'The proposal of an annual fee for EVs makes sense on its face as those owners don't pay the federal or local gasoline taxes,' Thomas says. 'However, most calculations say the average driver pays around $100 in gas taxes a year and this fee is clearly more than that.' And EV owners often do pay state and local fees tied to their cars, depending on the tax rules of the state where they live. While the Senate bill wouldn't charge EV owners an annual fee and the House includes it, both chambers agree on one thing: Eliminating the federal EV tax credit altogether. With the EV credit potentially ending soon, drivers considering an EV purchase may want to act quickly. Waiting could mean missing out on valuable tax incentives that can help lower the cost. Learn more: 5 tax deductions you can claim without itemizing Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
