Tough new vape rules set to kick in
By Nik Dirga of RNZ
Explainer - Disposable vape fans will see their habit go up in smoke from Tuesday as tough new vape rules kick in.
Here's what you need to know about changes to vape sales and advertising. What's being banned?
The distribution, manufacture, sale and supply of disposable vapes is being banned from Tuesday.
"We are getting rid of vapes that are most popular among young people, and that can only be positive," Associate Health Minister Casey Costello said in announcing the changes last year.
The 2023/24 NZ Health Survey found 10.5 percent of people aged 15 to 17 vaped daily.
However, pod-style vaping devices will still be sold. They contain pre-filled pods which are swapped out to refill the vape.
Also as of Tuesday, vaping devices, products and packaging can no longer be displayed at general retailers. Specialist vape stores must not display products in any way that makes them visible from outside their place of business - that includes advertising, display in online stores and in vending machines.
There are also many new restrictions on advertising to promote or encourage the use of vaping products, including to existing customers. The new raft of advertising restrictions mean businesses could face a $2000 infringement fine.
For instance, the government says it would violate the new regulations if a shop is advertising or posting about vaping products on social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter or Google business listings.
"From the 17th June we will no longer be able to show images of the products," one online vape retailer says on its website.
There's quite a lot of detail in the new advertising rules and a full breakdown can be found on Health New Zealand's website.
Also as of Tuesday, vaping specialist retailers can no longer use various promotional techniques such as giving away free vaping products, discounts, offering rewards, cash rebates or gifts for the purchase of vaping products, or offer lotteries or games to people who buy vaping products. Haven't there already been some restrictions on vapes?
Yes, as part of the series of changes to the Smokefree Environments and Regulated Products Act 1990 last year. The new changes are the second line of alterations which began coming into effect in December.
As of December, fines for selling to minors and publishing prohibited advertisements were increased, and new vape speciality stores were forbidden from opening within 100 metres of early childhood education centres. There were already location restrictions saying speciality vape stores had to be at least 300 metres from schools or marae.
In introducing the amendments to smoking regulations last year, Associate Health Minister Casey Costello said, "New Zealand was too slow to effectively regulate vaping, and youth vaping rates are too high".
"We have collectively agreed that, we have recognised that, and we know that we can do better. We have to stop young people from taking it up as a habit."
The ban on disposable vapes was put off for six months to allow retailers to prepare for the changes.
Jonathan Devery, chair of the Vaping Industry Association of New Zealand, said the group does support the disposable vapes ban, with a few caveats.
He said while VIANZ "supports the intent behind the policy - to reduce youth access and address the environmental impact of single-use products - the association is urging caution about the potential unintended consequences".
University of Otago public health professor Janet Hoek, a leading researcher into vaping, said whether or not the ban will make a difference will depend on enforcement and product innovation by the industry. Will people just switch from disposable vapes to refillable pods?
"I would expect [the ban] to reduce youth vaping given young people are very price sensitive," Hoek said. "However, if the industry responds, as I think it is likely to do, by introducing cheaper pod vapes, the impact will be much less limited than we might hope."
"They're not a straightforward replacement," Devery said. "There's a real risk that removing the most convenient smoking cessation option could drive consumers back to cigarettes."
Hoek said many manufacturers may look for loopholes they can exploit with bans.
"Disposable vapes are typically inexpensive [i.e., may cost less than $10 a device], so the vaping industry may respond by introducing new lower priced reusable vapes," Hoek said, saying she had seen pod starter kits - without pods, which cost extra - being advertised for under $10.
"We saw this behaviour among tobacco companies as they tried to undermine the impact of increased tobacco excise taxes [they 'shifted' the tax to higher priced brands, away from lower priced brands and introduced entirely new brands to create a new 'super value' partition within the market]."
Devery of VIANZ said it's possible some vape sales may just go underground.
"There are also serious concerns about enforcement," he said. "Early warnings from the UK, where a disposable vape ban came into effect on 1 June, suggest black market sales are likely to increase."
Hoek said there is a lot of concern that manufacturers may find ways around disposable bans - she pointed to 'Big Puff' high-capacity throwaway vapes that have drawn concern in the UK with their own disposables ban. What does this mean for the vaping industry?
"We have consistently called for a full ban on disposable vapes, rather than incremental technical fixes, and we welcome the environmental benefits it will bring," Devery said. "But the transition must be managed carefully to avoid driving consumers back to smoking or into unregulated markets."
The industry group feels that some of the advertising restrictions may ultimately harm consumers and make it harder for retailers to interact with them.
"Many retailers, especially online, have relied on clear product information and guidance to help adults make informed choices," Devery said. "New restrictions will limit what can be communicated, making it harder for consumers to understand available options or find support to switch."
"Retailers are still recovering from last year's rushed regulations that left them with unsellable stock and high compliance costs - from updating websites to in-store signage," he said.
Many retailers have discounted their products heavily before the bans take effect. But should more be done to control vaping?
Hoek said she thought the new measures would help cut youth vaping, but more strategy was needed.
"There are many omissions from the measures (e.g., the high concentration of vape stores in lower income communities; the location of vape stores right next to schools). I would favour a more proactive strategy that reduced the appeal, availability, addictiveness and affordability of vaping products."
One of the key complaints about disposable vapes have been the waste they generate, Devery said.
"Removing disposables will help cut vape-related e-waste by over 80 percent according to our industry estimates, but more must be done," he said. "VIANZ recommends expanded take-back schemes like VapeCycle, producer-responsibility regulations, and better consumer education on safe disposal."
"I would favour a 'polluter pays' model, where vape companies are responsible for the costs their products create," Hoek said.
"Vape companies have been given clear rules to follow, and yet some are already looking for loopholes," Asthma and Respiratory Foundation chief executive Letitia Harding said in a statement. Will this help New Zealand meet its Smokefree 2025 goals?
Back in 2011, New Zealand's government set the goal of a Smokefree New Zealand by 2025. There have been concerns that goal is falling short, with particular worries about Māori and Pasifika smoking rates.
Costello has maintained the government's changes will continue work toward the target.
"We do not want our young people vaping," Costello said in Parliament. "We do not want them taking up this habit. We do not want them to be nicotine addicted. We also don't want anybody taking up tobacco and smoking."
The current smokefree goal aims to have less than 5 percent of the population smoking by December, but the latest data reveals there are still about 300,000 daily smokers - 6.9 percent of adults - across the country.
"VIANZ urges the government to closely monitor the ban's impact on smoking rates, particularly among priority groups, and ensure regulations don't inadvertently harm those most vulnerable," Deverey said.
"Vaping regulation must be viewed in the context of the devastating harm caused by smoking, which kills two out of every three users."
"Strong rules and environmental responsibility are essential, but the broader goal must remain to reduce smoking and improve public health outcomes."
Hoek said it's important vaping retailers were brought along on that goal.
"People who sell vaping products should be able to help people switch successfully from smoking to vaping," she said.
"We also need to let people know that, once they have switched completely to vaping and no longer think there's a risk they would return to smoking, they should stop vaping.
"That latter message isn't [for obvious reasons] communicated by vaping companies or retailers."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Techday NZ
a day ago
- Techday NZ
World's largest data breach exposes 16 billion credentials
The scale of the latest data breach, involving a staggering 16 billion new credentials and passwords, is forcing both experts and organisations to reckon with the ongoing weaknesses in global digital security. Described as the world's largest data breach, the incident has reportedly swept up data from a vast array of online platforms, including not only commercial giants like Apple and Google but also government services and numerous SaaS (Software as a Service) applications. Brian Soby, co-founder and CTO at AppOmni, whose company specialises in securing digital records, believes the breach was inevitable given the industry's reliance on outmoded security frameworks. Soby warns that the gravity of the situation goes beyond the raw numbers: "This isn't just a collection of old, previously leaked passwords; it appears to be a new, massive, and highly organised library of credentials." According to Soby, cybercriminals now hold a "roadmap for widespread account takeovers" that threatens the backbone of modern digital life — cloud services and SaaS applications — potentially outpacing many current security defences. Soby highlights a critical vulnerability at the heart of today's enterprises. While many organisations invest in identity management and access security projects, basic misconfigurations and failure to disable outdated forms of credential use leave them exposed. "Large credential dumps such as these are likely to highlight just how many organisations indeed remain vulnerable to credential attacks due to these insufficient protections," he adds. Spencer Young, Senior Vice President EMEA at cybersecurity firm Delinea, echoes the concern, underlining that static credentials, especially passwords which are seldom changed, represent an Achilles' heel. "Passwords alone – especially unrotated ones – leave consumers and organisations vulnerable to phishing, credential stuffing, and Pass-the-Hash attacks," he notes. Young stresses that the traditional advice of strong password hygiene is no longer sufficient. Instead, initiatives like automated password rotation and credential vaulting, which reduce the window of opportunity for attackers, should be the new standard. In terms of longer-term solutions, Young observes that passwordless authentication approaches are gaining traction. "Technologies such as biometrics, where biometric data remains encrypted and safely stored in the device and does not travel across the network, improves the authentication process," he explains. However, he warns that passwords themselves are far from obsolete; they are increasingly being relegated to the background as part of a layered, multifactor authorisation system that may include one-time passwords or magic links to enhance security. With cybercriminals orchestrating campaigns using vast troves of login data, the scale of weaponisation is unprecedented. Tim Eades, CEO and co-founder at Anetac, illustrates the dilemma facing organisations across the world, as these troves become "a commodity that are bought, sold, and weaponised in countless attacks." Eades notes that the unrelenting circulation of stolen records magnifies the risk over time, especially as new AI agents — sometimes deployed without adequate safeguards — can introduce further vulnerabilities and thousands of new access points for attackers. "The part that keeps CISOs up at night? These records circulate for years, the risk doesn't go away, it only grows over time." Raising further alarm, Eades points out that until affected organisations are identified, compromised individuals may have no warning or recourse. This opacity not only endangers users but also perpetuates a cycle in which threat actors vie to surpass one another, pushing the boundaries of data breaches ever further. He urges organisations to reinforce security measures: "Leaders should protect all credentials like they are the keys to the castle." Encouraging the use of unique passwords, two-factor authentication, and embedding a culture of security awareness are presented as essential starting points. Another concern arising from the breach is the "snowball effect" it might have on cyber-attacks, especially through the proliferation of sleeper accounts. Xavier Sheikrojan, Senior Risk Intelligence Manager at Signifyd, warns that fraudsters may use stolen credentials not just for immediate exploitation but to create dormant accounts for later and larger-scale attacks. He advocates for proactive action, urging businesses to monitor user behaviour, force password resets, and continually refine machine learning systems aimed at picking up fraudulent activity. As experts across the sector agree, the exposure of billions of records simultaneously marks a pivotal moment in the digital security landscape. While technology continues to advance, so too does the capacity and sophistication of cybercrime, prompting renewed calls for organisations and individuals alike to treat identity and access security with unwavering seriousness and vigilance.
Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
'Heavy hearts': Cafe goes into liquidation
Photo: London Canteen / Facebook The owners of Christchurch's London Canteen have let their customers know with "heavy hearts" the cafe at Oderings Garden Centre in Barrington has gone into liquidation. The canteen is under the company Table Bloom with directors listed as Simon Suffolk and Jisuk (Julie) Han who are shareholders with Edmund Tanner. Christchurch liquidator Brenton John Hunt from Insolvency Matters was appointed on June 16. The canteen owners posted on a Facebook page they were devastated. ''It's with heavy hearts that we share that London Canteen has closed its doors. Unfortunately, due to circumstances beyond our control, we've had to make the tough decision to enter liquidation. This has been an incredibly difficult decision and one we never imagined having to make so soon. We've poured everything into this venture, from the food and the atmosphere to the people, and we're proud of what we've built.'' In the post signed off by Simon, Julie and the London Canteen team, they thanked their customers, supporters, suppliers, and staff. ''Your loyalty and love have meant the world. We've been humbled by the community that formed around us, and we'll carry those memories and connections with us into the future.'' Cafe clients replied they were disappointed to hear the cafe was closed and thanked them for the ''absolute perfection'' of their menu. Customers with remaining bookings were told they would be contacted soon. Co-owner Julie Han was the Outstanding Chef winner in the 2024 Canterbury Hospitality Awards. Judges praised her as being a visionary and a leader, with a passion for the food culture woven into the fabric of Canterbury and delivered onto every plate. She was described as an ambassador of local produce and innovator of new techniques.
Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Christchurch cafe goes into liquidation
Photo: London Canteen / Facebook The owners of Christchurch's London Canteen have let their customers know with "heavy hearts" the cafe at Oderings Garden Centre in Barrington has gone into liquidation. The canteen is under the company Table Bloom with directors listed as Simon Suffolk and Jisuk (Julie) Han who are shareholders with Edmund Tanner. Christchurch liquidator Brenton John Hunt from Insolvency Matters was appointed on June 16. The canteen owners posted on a Facebook page they were devastated. ''It's with heavy hearts that we share that London Canteen has closed its doors. Unfortunately, due to circumstances beyond our control, we've had to make the tough decision to enter liquidation. This has been an incredibly difficult decision and one we never imagined having to make so soon. We've poured everything into this venture, from the food and the atmosphere to the people, and we're proud of what we've built.'' In the post signed off by Simon, Julie and the London Canteen team, they thanked their customers, supporters, suppliers, and staff. ''Your loyalty and love have meant the world. We've been humbled by the community that formed around us, and we'll carry those memories and connections with us into the future.'' Cafe clients replied they were disappointed to hear the cafe was closed and thanked them for the ''absolute perfection'' of their menu. Customers with remaining bookings were told they would be contacted soon. Co-owner Julie Han was the Outstanding Chef winner in the 2024 Canterbury Hospitality Awards. Judges praised her as being a visionary and a leader, with a passion for the food culture woven into the fabric of Canterbury and delivered onto every plate. She was described as an ambassador of local produce and innovator of new techniques.
