How to read the tea leaves on stalled $8B Paramount-Skydance deal
Everyone is reading the tea leaves these days on the seemingly forever stalled $8 billion Skydance-Paramount deal.
The Wall Street fortune tellers keep looking for clues as to whether Paramount heiress Shari Redstone will pay President Trump what he wants to settle a $20 billion lawsuit against its CBS subsidiary?
And if she does, will that be enough to get the deal approved by his broadcast regulators.
Advertisement
The Wall Street fortune tellers keep speculating as to whether Shari Redstone will pay Trump what he wants to settle a $20 billion lawsuit against CBS.
Jack Forbes / NY Post Design
On The Money exists at least in part to cut through the malarkey – and tell you that the latest tea leaves being closely examined are (as a certain great playwright once said) full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
One of those tea leaves led to the suggestion that Paramount laid off people earlier this week, a pretty steep 3% of its current workforce, because it's planning that the deal will not go through.
Layoffs of such a magnitude usually occur not when two parties are about to merge, but long before, or when there is no deal in the works. The thinking is that current management is resizing the business because they plan on operating Paramount for the foreseeable future.
Advertisement
As On The Money was first to report, Paramount's top brass – aside from Redstone (she's recused herself because of the potential payday) – is wary of the optics of paying off Trump so Shari can walk away with what's left of the nest egg left to her by her father, the late merger impresario Sumner Redstone.
They fear it could open the company to bribery charges by settling the frivolous lawsuit – alleging '60 Minutes' deceptively edited an interview with Kamala Harris in the heat of the campaign (Trump won the election so there's no damages) – that their directors and officers insurance doesn't cover if some prosecutor brought a case.
All true, but the layoffs had little to do with the future of the deal, one way or the other, people close the transaction told On The Money.
Advertisement
Paramount fears it could open the company to bribery charges by settling the frivolous lawsuit – alleging '60 Minutes' deceptively edited an interview with Kamala Harris in the heat of the campaign.
60 Minutes / CBS
SkyDance had planned to own Paramount by now, and was planning the exact same cuts to make the numbers work before it can invest and grow the business, sources said.
With the deal in limbo, Paramount just did it first so cross that tea leaf off your list.
The second tea leaf is a little more interesting, though I am told, just as inconsequential to the deal's outcome.
Advertisement
It involves the appearance of Skydance boss David Ellison ringside at a UFC 314 fight in Miami several weeks ago with Trump, who was shaking hands and schmoozing with the likes of Joe Rogan and Shaquille O'Neal.
The tea-leaf-reading talk here speculated that the deal is back on – Trump can't wait to approve it as a favor to David's dad, and Trump bestie, Larry Ellison. Why would Trump be seen with Larry's kid if he were about to screw him?
Except, guess who else was ringside as Trump made his way through the crowd? Elon Musk, yes that Elon who had just called Trump some really nasty names. So nasty that earlier this week, Elon issued a semi-apology. He was sitting with his son, not far from the younger Ellison and Trump.
So cross that one off as well, deal watchers tell me.
For now, those looking for clues on how this stalemate ends will have to turn over a new tea leaf.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
17 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump Says He's Nearing a Possible Deal With Harvard
President Trump said his administration was 'working closely' with Harvard University and could announce a deal within the next week. The White House and Harvard have been locked in battle since late March. Trump has pulled billions in federal funds over antisemitism and DEI concerns, tried to block Harvard's ability to enroll international students and threatened its tax-exempt status. Harvard has sued the administration, saying the government has violated its First Amendment rights.
Axios
17 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump admin shortens ACA enrollment window
The Trump administration on Friday narrowed the period to sign up for Affordable Care Act coverage and imposed other restrictions aimed at rolling back Biden-era flexibilities for the program. Why it matters: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services expects the new policies to lower marketplace premiums by about 5% on average, and save taxpayers $12 billion next year. But between 725,000 and 1.8 million people are expected to lose coverage, per CMS's projections. The big picture: Congress is considering codifying many of the same provisions in the massive GOP budget bill that's now in the Senate. That would make them much harder for a future administration to undo. State of play: CMS is shortening the period for enrolling in marketplace insurance by two weeks, starting for plan year 2027. Federal exchanges will then be open for sign-ups from Nov. 1 through Dec. 31 of each year. It's also repealing the monthly opportunity started under the Biden administration for lower-income people to get marketplace coverage. The new rule limits plans' ability to cover gender-affirming care beginning next year. It also excludes Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients from obtaining ACA coverage. CMS said the policies will ensure federal subsidies to offset the cost of ACA coverage only support statutory goals of the law. Yes, but: In response to public comments, CMS is making several of its changes temporary. For plan year 2026 only, CMS will begin charging a $5 monthly premium for consumers who are automatically reenrolled in an ACA plan from one year to the next and would otherwise have fully subsidized coverage. Other changes concerning income verification for enrollees will also end after 2026. Between the lines: Insurance losses from the new policy will be felt hardest in states where "erroneous and improper enrollment is most noticeable," including Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Utah, CMS said.
Boston Globe
27 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
A potential strike on Iran tests Trump's propensity to play to both sides
Since his first campaign for president 10 years ago, Trump has excelled at appearing to favor both sides of the same issue, allowing supporters to hear what they want to hear, whether he's talking about tariffs, TikTok, abortion, tax cuts, or more. But the prospect that the United States might join Israel in bombing Iran is testing his ability to embrace dueling positions with little to no political cost. Some of Trump's most ardent supporters — those who defended him during multiple investigations and ultimately returned him to the White House — are ripping one another to shreds over the idea and at times lashing out at Trump as well. Advertisement The war in Iran is exactly the kind of Middle East entanglement that Trump's anti-interventionist base believed he was bitterly opposed to, because he repeatedly said he was. But he is also the same president who, in his first term, authorized missile strikes in Syria, after its leadership used chemical weapons on citizens, and the assassination of a top Iranian general, Qassem Soleimani — two actions he took pride in. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up To Trump, the contradictions are not actually contradictions. 'I think I'm the one that decides that,' he told The Atlantic recently in response to criticism from one of his most vocal anti-interventionist supporters, Tucker Carlson, who said the president's support for Israel's fight in Iran ran against his 'America First' message. Trump was propelled to victory in the Republican primary in 2016 as an outsider, in part because he forcefully condemned the invasion of Iraq, authorized by the last Republican president more than a decade before, and the seemingly endless war that followed. Yet he said the United States should have taken the country's oil, and ran radio ads saying he would 'bomb the hell' out of the Islamic State group. Advertisement He has said he wants to renew the tax cuts he put into effect in his first term, which saved some of the wealthiest earners millions, while also suggesting that congressional Republicans should implement a new tax on the wealthiest. He has said he supports businesses and also wants to deport the immigrant workforce that fuels parts of the economy. He wants to engage in mass deportation and also wants to sell visas for $5 million. He has celebrated the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade as a point of pride while also condemning Republican governors who signed bills banning most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. He has both celebrated and criticized his own criminal justice reform bill of 2018. Despite the contradictions, Republicans for years have been united in support of Trump and what he says he wants, giving him a benefit of the doubt that few, if any, career politicians have ever received. Even when most elected Republicans held Trump at a distance after the deadly attack on the Capitol by a pro-Trump mob on Jan. 6, 2021, Trump still had a tight grip on Republican primary voters. Trump, a celebrity known to the electorate for decades, has obscured long-standing and unresolved foreign policy divisions within the party dating back to the aftermath of President George W. Bush's push to invade Iraq. Advertisement But as Trump decides whether to plunge the United States into the heart of the Israel-Iran conflict, his core supporters are splintering. Trump's announcement Thursday that he could take up to two weeks to decide did not sit well with some of his most hawkish supporters. On social media, Fox News host Mark Levin began a lengthy post by suggesting that the president was being pulled back from what he actually wants to do. 'LET TRUMP BE TRUMP!' Levin wrote. 'We got our answer. Iran says no unconditional surrender. Again. And again. And again. They cheat and lie and kill. They're TERRORISTS!' His anti-interventionist supporters, meanwhile, have been equally alarmed by what he might decide to do. 'Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA,' Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republican of Georgia, posted on social media over the weekend. Trump's advisers say that on the Israel-Iran conflict in particular, the president is dealing with a fast-moving, complicated situation that does not lend itself to simple, black-and-white solutions, despite the fact that he has consistently campaigned that way. 'President Trump considers the nuances of every issue but ultimately takes decisive action to directly benefit American families,' said Anna Kelly, a White House spokesperson. 'The American people trust this president to make the right decisions,' she said, adding that he 'started the Make America Great Again movement because he represents a new leadership that puts Americans first.' But in 2025, Trump is not the only one who can command media attention. Carlson is no longer on Fox News, but he has a show that streams on the social platform X and is a leading voice among foreign policy 'restrainers' who have argued that Trump would be acting against his own movement should he strike Iran. Advertisement Steve Bannon, an adviser who was exiled from the White House in the first year of Trump's first term, has become one of the dominant voices among the MAGA faithful with his 'War Room' podcast, delivering the same message as Carlson. Yet Trump has found that many of his allies will ultimately come back to him, despite unhappiness with some of his decisions.
