Why Trump may have opposed killing of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

President Donald Trump said this week that the US knows where Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is, but won't kill him "at least not for now." His statement came as Israel launched a barrage of attacks on Iran, hinting at the possibility of a "dictatorship collapse" or a regime change in the Islamic nation.
In a post on TRUTH social media, Trump wrote, 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!'
Last week, several reports suggested that Trump had vetoed an Israeli plan to kill Khamenei. Three US officials told CBS News that Trump opposed a recent Israeli plan to kill Iran's Supreme Leader. Trump also delayed a decision on possibly bombing Iran's nuclear sites.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-netanyahu-rejected-israeli-plan-kill-iran-ayatollah-ali-khamenei-sources/
But why doesn't Trump want Iranian Supreme leader's killing or a "regime change" in Iran?
President Trump's wariness over bombing Iran could be due to his concerns about creating 'another Libya' if Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei is toppled, administration insiders told the New York Post. One source close to the administration said he had also mentioned Afghanistan and Iraq.
Trump 'doesn't want it [Iran] to turn into Libya,' said one insider familiar with the US administration's deliberations on potentially joining Israel's airstrikes against Iran's nuclear program.
According to the report, Trump had in recent days specifically mentioned Libya's decade-long plunge into anarchy in 2011 — after the US joined a NATO bombing campaign to oust dictator Muammar Gaddafi — three sources close to the administration said.
'Libya was a much more extended kind of bombing commitment, and it ended up being regime change,' the fifth source noted.
The source who heard the president directly mention the comparison said there are two reasons Trump talks about Libya: "the first is the chaos after what we did to Gaddafi. The second is the Libya intervention made it more difficult to negotiate deals with countries like North Korea and Iran."
One source reportedly said the president seems "most inclined to order limited airstrikes to finish off Iran's nuclear facilities at Fordow and Natanz..."
'If the regime falls [in Iran], then it's not on Trump, because that's not the goal of his very limited strike," the source told The Post. The source mentioned concern that 'we get somebody worse than Khamenei.'
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Thursday afternoon that Trump was biding his time before deciding whether to join Israel's strikes 'based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future.'
The Telegraph reported that Khamenei's death could lead to a vacuum at the heart of government that might trigger internal strife, creating opportunities for Iran's myriad ethnic minority groups to rise up. This could "potentially igniting local conflicts that could spiral into a broader civil war," the report added.
Fearing such an outcome, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) could also attempt to seize power and turn Iran into a theocratic military dictatorship. Any such outcome would risk chaos on global oil markets, one reason why traders are so anxious about the supreme leader's fate, the report added.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Indian Express

20 minutes ago

• Indian Express

Israel-Iran conflict: Day after Israeli attack, nuclear watchdog confirms damages to key under-construction reactor near Tehran

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IEAE) has confirmed that Israel's strikes on Friday resulted in damages to key buildings at the partially constructed Khondab (formerly known as Arak) Heavy Water Production Plant including its distillation unit. The nuclear watchdog's statement comes a day after the global body said no damages were 'initially visible'. 'While damage to the nearby Heavy Water Production Plant was initially not visible, it is now assessed that key buildings at the facility were damaged, including the distillation unit,' the IEAE's latest statement on 'Updates on developments in Iran' said. No damage has been observed at Iran's other nuclear sites so far, it added. No radiological consequence was expected, IEAE's Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said. This has been attributed to the reactor not being operational and not containing any nuclear material. 'There is a lot of nuclear material in Iran in different places, which means that the potential for a radiological accident with the dispersion in the atmosphere of radioactive materials and particles does exist,' he added, stressing on the possible nuclear safety risks. IAEA, in its statement, also sought to receive timely and regular technical information about the nuclear facilities and their respective sites in the country. 'This information is needed to promptly inform the international community and ensure an effective response and assistance to any emergency situation in Iran,' Director General Grossi said. He added that the agency was also in constant contact with other countries in the region amid the ongoing tensions in the Middle East. The Khondab reactor was hit on Thursday (June 19) as the both Israel and Iran continued to trade strikes on the seventh day of the conflict. The Israeli strikea also damaged the nearby plant that makes heavy water. Heavy-water reactors can be used to produce plutonium which, like enriched uranium, can be used to make an atom bomb. So far, Israel has announced that its attacks have hit prominent Iranian nuclear sites in Natanz, Isfahan, Arak and Tehran itself. With AP inputs

Time of India

26 minutes ago

• Time of India

Donald Trump Reposts Kayla Harrison Video; Internet Goes Wild

Donald Trump's cage-side appearance at UFC 316 has stirred more than just cheers, it's ignited a firestorm online. After champion Kayla Harrison leapt out of the cage to celebrate with him, Trump shared the moment on Truth Social. But what really grabbed attention was that he posted the same video twice. The clip shows Trump hugging Kayla, kissing her cheek, and patting her exposed stomach. As it went viral, critics accused him of overstepping and using the moment for political optics. Comments poured in, ranging from 'Be careful with that felon' to 'Left would say you groped her.' While supporters praised the gesture as patriotic, the trolling hasn't stopped. Trump doubling down has left many wondering: was this genuine admiration, or calculated media bait?

First Post

27 minutes ago

• First Post

Should India worry about Trump's lunch with Pakistan's Asim Munir?

US President Donald Trump and Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir had lunch at the White House on Wednesday (June 18). This is the first time that a US president has made such an invitation to the chief of the Pakistan Army. What's brewing? Should New Delhi be vigilant? read more US President Donald Trump and Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir had lunch at the White House on Wednesday (June 18). This is the first time that a US President has made such an invite to the head of the Pakistan Army who is not head of state. New Delhi will be undoubtedly watching the events with interest. While many in India had celebrated the return of Trump to the White House, others questioned whether it would be to New Delhi's benefit. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But how worried should India be about the lunch? Let's take a closer look: What happened? Munir, who is on a five-day trip to the United States , has thus far received the red-carpet treatment. Trump at the luncheon was accompanied by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Special Representative for the Middle East Steve Witkoff. Munir was accompanied by National Security Advisor Lt Gen Asim Malik, who is also the head of the intelligence agency Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). Trump, speaking at the White House, said he wanted to thank Munir for not going to war with India. 'The reason I had him here, I want to thank him for not going into the war, ending the war (with India). And I want to thank, as you know, Prime Minister Modi,' he said. Asim Munir was recently promoted to Field Marshal. AFP Trump said that 'two very smart people decided not to keep going with that war'. 'That could have been a nuclear war. Those are two nuclear powers, big ones, big, big nuclear powers, and they decided (to end the conflict),' he added. When asked if the talks included the Iran-Israel conflict, Trump said: 'They (Pakistan) know Iran very well, better than most, and they're not happy about anything. It's not that they're bad with Israel. They know them both, actually, but they know Iran better." 'The engagement marks a significant moment in the ongoing efforts to reinforce the longstanding partnership between Pakistan and the United States, built upon shared objectives of peace, stability, and prosperity,' the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the media wing of the Pakistan Army, said in a statement after the lunch. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Apart from lunch at the White House with Trump, Munir also met a number of top US security officials at the Pentagon, the state department, and Central Command headquarters in Florida. How worried should India be? Some argue that New Delhi should be worried. After all, this is the first time a US President has invited a Pakistani military chief who isn't head of state to the White House. Ayub Khan, Zia ul-Haq and Pervez Musharraf were all heads up state at the time they were hosted at the White House. This despite Pakistan continuing to back terror groups and Indian intelligence agencies even investigating if Munir's remarks instigated the Pahalgam atta ck in April. Trump's tone on Pakistan has also undergone a jarring shift. Trump just a few years ago accused Pakistan of offering the United States 'nothing but lies and deceitful'. However, this must be seen in light of what Trump can personally get from Pakistan. Trump, since returning to office, has made cryptocurrency and rare earth minerals a top priority. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Pakistan, which recently established a Crypto Council, has tied up with a firm with links to the Trump family. US President Donald Trump speaks with reporters while flying aboard Air Force One en route from Calgary, Canada to Joint Base Andrews. AP Incidentally, Zachary Witkoff, the son of Steve Witkoff, represented the firm at the meetings with senior Pakistani officials including Munir. Pakistan has also invited US companies to invest in its mineral reserves – which are estimated to be worth trillions of dollars. Pakistan is also eager to reach a trade deal with the US – another Trump priority. 'President Trump expressed keen interest in forging a mutually beneficial trade partnership with Pakistan based on long-term strategic convergence and shared interests,' the ISPR statement added. Analysts says this is Trump's modus operandi – dealing with a country strictly on a quid pro quo basis. 'The Trump-Munir meeting shouldn't be seen only through the lens of the Israel-Iran war,' Michael Kugelman, a Washington-based south Asia analyst, told The Guardian. 'There's been US-Pakistan engagement on crypto, minerals and counter-terrorism, and Trump takes a deep personal interest in all of these.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'This is classic Trump: 'What can you do for me? What can I get out of this?'' Trump's claims about also being responsible for the ceasefire between India and Pakistan are also causing a backlash for the Modi government. Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a phone call with Trump Tuesday denied that the United States played any role in the ceasefire. Modi said that India has never sought third party mediation and would never do so. Modi said that the ceasefire came at the behest of Pakistan. Some argue that India should not be surprised given the United States' history of prioritising Pakistan – given its strategic location and its pliability to Washington many demands – since the Cold War. They say that India has positioned itself as a far more reliable and trustworthy partner. They add that the US is likely courting Pakistan at the moment in case it needs a base from which to launch operations against Iran. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Marvin Weinbaum, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute (MEI), and former state department official, speaking to Al Jazeera, warned Pakistan that 'nothing is permanent in this administration'. 'If Pakistan does play some role in the Iran crisis, they have could have more substantial meaning to these ties. But it needs to be prepared that there is nothing settled with this administration. It can change on a dime, at any hour,' he added. With input from agencies