Europe's lithium quest hampered by China and lack of cash
ET Online
The key to locking down long-term lithium supply is closer ties in the so-called "lithium triangle" formed by Chile, Argentina and Bolivia, which account for nearly half of the world's reserves.
Europe's ambition to be a world player in decarbonised transportation arguably depends on sourcing lithium abroad, especially in South America.Even the bloc's broader energy security and climate goals could depend on securing a steady supply of the key mineral, used in batteries and other clean energy supply chains.But Europe has run into a trio of obstacles: lack of money, double-edged regulations and competition from China, analysts told AFP.China has a major head start.It currently produces more than three-quarters of batteries sold worldwide, refines 70 percent of raw lithium and is the world's third-largest extractor behind Australia and Chile, according to 2024 data from the United States Geological Survey.
To gain a foothold, Europe has developed a regulatory framework that emphasises environmental preservation, quality job creation and cooperation with local communities.It has also signed bilateral agreements with about 15 countries, including Chile and Argentina, the world's fifth-largest lithium producer.But too often it fails to deliver when it comes to investment, say experts."I see a lot of memoranda of understanding, but there is a lack of action," Julia Poliscanova, director of electric vehicles at the Transport and Environment (T&E) think tank, told AFP."More than once, on the day that we signed another MoU, the Chinese were buying an entire mine in the same country."The investment gap is huge: China spent $6 billion on lithium projects abroad from 2020 to 2023, while Europe barely coughed up a billion dollars over the same period, according to data compiled by T&E.
Lagging investment At the same time, the bottleneck in supply has tightened: last year saw a 30 percent increase in global demand for lithium, according to a recent report from the International Energy Agency (IEA)."To secure the supply of raw materials, China is actively investing in mines abroad through state-owned companies with political support from the government," the IEA noted.China's Belt and Road Initiative funnelled $21.4 billion into mining beyond its shores in 2024, according to the report.Europe, meanwhile, is "lagging behind in investment levels in these areas", said Sebastian Galarza, founder of the Centre for Sustainable Mobility in Santiago, Chile."The lack of a clear path for developing Europe's battery and mining industries means that gap will be filled by other actors."In Africa, for example, Chinese demand has propelled Zimbabwe to become the fourth-largest lithium producer in the world."The Chinese let their money do the talking," said Theo Acheampong, an analyst at the European Council on Foreign Relations.By 2035, all new cars and vans sold in the European Union must produce zero carbon emissions, and EU leaders and industry would like as much as possible of that market share to be sourced locally.Last year, just over 20 percent of new vehicles sold in the bloc were electric."Currently, only four percent of Chile's lithium goes to Europe," noted Stefan Debruyne, director of external affairs at Chilean private mining company SQM."The EU has every opportunity to increase its share of the battery industry."
Shifting supply chains But Europe's plans to build dozens of battery factories have been hampered by fluctuating consumer demand and competition from Japan (Panasonic), South Korea (LG Energy Solution, Samsung) and, above all, China (CATL, BYD).The key to locking down long-term lithium supply is closer ties in the so-called "lithium triangle" formed by Chile, Argentina and Bolivia, which account for nearly half of the world's reserves, analysts say.To encourage cooperation with these countries, European actors have proposed development pathways that would help establish electric battery production in Latin America.Draft EU regulations would allow Latin America to "reconcile local development with the export of these raw materials, and not fall into a purely extractive cycle", said Juan Vazquez, deputy head for Latin America and the Caribbean at the OECD Development Centre.But it is still unclear whether helping exporting countries develop complete supply chains makes economic sense, or will ultimately tilt in Europe's favour."What interest do you have as a company in setting up in Chile to produce cathodes, batteries or more sophisticated materials if you don't have a local or regional market to supply?" said Galarza."Why not just take the lithium, refine it and do everything in China and send the battery back to us?"Pointing to the automotive tradition in Mexico, Brazil and Argentina, Galarza suggested an answer."We must push quickly towards the electrification of transport in the region so we can share in the benefits of the energy transition," he argued.But the road ahead looks long.Electric vehicles were only two percent of new car sales in Mexico and Chile last year, six percent in Brazil and seven percent in Colombia, according to the IEA.The small nation of Costa Rica stood out as the only nation in the region where EVs hit double digits, at 15 percent of new car sales.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
ICICI Bank once wanted to acquire HDFC, Deepak Parekh spills the secret
Deepak Parekh revealed Chanda Kochhar's merger proposal between ICICI and HDFC, predating HDFC's reverse merger. Parekh cited regulatory pressure from the RBI as the primary driver for the HDFC-HDFC Bank merger, emphasizing the need for larger Indian banks. Post-merger, ICICI Bank has outperformed HDFC Bank in key metrics like profit growth and net interest margin. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Former HDFC chairman Deepak Parekh has revealed that former ICICI Bank chief Chanda Kochhar once proposed a merger between ICICI and HDFC, well before HDFC's reverse merger with its own banking a conversation with Kochhar on her YouTube channel, Parekh recounted, "I remember you talking to me once. I remember it very clearly. It's never been talked about in public, but I'm willing to share it now. You said that ICICI started HDFC. 'Why don't you come back home?' That was your offer."Parekh said he declined the offer at the time, saying it "won't be fair" or "proper with our name and the bank and all."Parekh described the eventual HDFC-HDFC Bank merger, completed in July 2023, as a move driven by regulatory compulsions rather than business ambition. The Reserve Bank of India had classified large NBFCs like HDFC, which then held assets exceeding ₹5 lakh crore, as systemically important — well above the ₹50,000-crore threshold."RBI supported us and they pushed us into it to some extent and they helped us," Parekh said. However, he added that there were "no concessions, no relief, no time, nothing."Parekh also said the deal had been executed with extreme confidentiality. 'It was kept a secret. No one knew about it—when it hit the press in the morning, that's when everyone found out. The government was aware because RBI was in touch with them, and we kept it so close—just lawyers, due diligence, accountants,' he on the conclusion of the merger, Parekh called it "a sad day and a happy day." He added, "It's good for the institution. It's good for the country to have large banks. Look at how large Chinese banks are. We have to be bigger, larger in India."On April 4, 2022, HDFC Bank announced its plan to acquire mortgage lender HDFC in a deal valued at about $40 billion, creating one of the largest financial institutions in Indian history. The merger gave rise to a banking entity worth $172 billion, affecting tens of millions of customers and shareholders across both companies, along with their group insurance and asset management said Indian banks must grow through acquisitions in order to become stronger in the also listed key concerns for chief executives, including continuing uncertainty in supply chains, trade policies, and export the insurance front, Parekh described it as the "least understood product" and criticised "mis-selling by banks" which, he said, was driven by the lure of high upfront HDFC Bank , in April this year, crossed the ₹15 lakh crore market capitalisation mark — an elite milestone — a quieter shift has been unfolding in the private banking space. ICICI Bank has steadily pulled ahead of HDFC Bank on several key performance Bank is now seen as a frontrunner among private sector lenders in India. HDFC Bank, meanwhile, has been navigating the after-effects of the 2023 merger, which have affected its growth FY25, ICICI Bank recorded profit growth of 15%, while HDFC Bank's profits rose by 11%. Both banks registered similar net interest income (NII) growth, but ICICI had a stronger net interest margin (NIM) of 4.41% compared with HDFC Bank's NIM of 3.65%.ICICI Bank also reported 14% growth in both advances and deposits for FY25. HDFC Bank, however, saw its advances grow at nearly half the pace of its merger added a substantial loan portfolio to HDFC Bank but did not bring in a matching level of deposits. This resulted in a spike in the loan-to-deposit ratio (LDR) to over 100% post-merger. Although HDFC Bank reduced this figure to 96.5% by the end of FY25, it still faces pressure to either increase deposits or slow down contrast, ICICI Bank's LDR stood at a healthier 82.4% as of March to the elevated LDR, HDFC Bank deliberately slowed down its credit expansion during FY25 to maintain balance. The bank's management believes that improving systemic liquidity will help raise deposits going forward.A high LDR suggests a bank is lending a large proportion of its deposits, which can become a risk if too many depositors withdraw funds at once and liquidity tightens.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump's policy curbs: New innovation order and India's strategic rise
The flows of globalisation were once imagined catalysing a new world order based on leveraging trade, talents and innovation. However, what is now being witnessed under the second term of President Donald Trump in the US is a reversal of such flows. While the US seeks to Make America Great Again, a reduced role of the world's most powerful actor in pushing such flows not just create a vacuum for other actors in the international system, but also lead the system to suffer several strains. Policies under Trump 2.0, in the form of tariffs and visa restrictions, as well intended as they may be for America's safeguarding of its sovereignty and prowess, are disrupting traditional economic and talent flows. Iran Israel War Live Updates: President Donald Trump said Iran should have signed a deal with the United States. (AFP) Extremely high tariffs, such as the proposed 100% duties on BRICS countries, aim to reshore manufacturing to the US, but they also risk increasing costs, while companies are pushed to seek alternatives outside China. How well this pans out for the US as well as other economies is something that is to be watched out for. Restrictions on H1-B visas and optional training programs, similarly, limit access to global talent, potentially creating skill gaps in US tech sectors. While it is the sovereign right for the US to decide what role it wants to play in the existing world order, other countries need to look out for themselves and turn adversities into opportunities. Disruptions to innovations in the US have been driving innovation to other hubs, as companies and talents seek environments with fewer restrictions and lower costs. Countries like India, Germany and Canada have been emerging as alternative hubs. In fact, the US's tightened visa policies have already led to a 15% rise in Indian student applications to Canadian Universities and increased interest in Germany's no-tuition public universities. In June this year, speaking in New Delhi, German ambassador to India, Philipp Ackermann stated that there are already 50,000 Indian students in Germany and the country is keen to welcome more. Meanwhile, US tech giants, which have been reliant on foreign talent, could face labour shortages, prompting companies to expand research and development centres abroad, particularly in India, where local talent, owing to the positive demographic dividend that India has; is abundant and costs are competitive. What this sort of decentralisation of innovation could lead to is a reduction of the US's dominance in tech, and could create a more multipolar innovation landscape. India, in fact is uniquely positioned to capitalise on these shifts owing to its robust IT sector, growing manufacturing capabilities and strategic alignment with US interests, particularly in countering China's influence. The push under Trump 2.0 to reduce reliance on Chinese tech firms, aligns with India's own efforts to limit Chinese influence in cybersecurity and telecommunications. As US forms diversify away from China, India is positioned as a prime destination for investment in semiconductors, 5G and AI. Indian tech giants such as Infosys, Wipro and TCS, could see increased demands as US companies expand operations in India. Additionally, restrictive H1-B policies may drive Indian tech professionals to build domestic startups, and help India in reducing brain drain, while further fostering India's own Silicon Valleys. In any case, US companies, seeking alternatives to Chinese manufacturing have been increasingly turning to India, particularly in auto components, pharmaceuticals and chemicals for example. In the realm of education and talent development, India can capitalise on the opportunity created by visa restrictions in the US, by expanding its own higher education system. Joint degree programmes with US institutions, potentially ties to Fulbright-Nehru scholarships can go a long way in attracting talents and fostering innovative ecosystems. The process has already started, as foreign Universities, are increasingly establishing a presence in India, driven by the National Education Policy (NEP), and the University Grants Commission regulations of 2023. Top global Universities, that are ranked in the top 500 globally or in specific subjects are to set up branch campuses, and to collaborate with Indian institutions. The path ahead for India however has challenges as well, and India has to navigate potential trade wars and further visa restrictions that can strain its $ 254 billion tech sector, which relies heavily on the US market. Diplomatic statecraft will be more crucial than ever to maintain strong bilateral ties, particularly given Trump's transactional approach. Preparing itself through further investments in education and tech is a necessity for India to navigate these challenges. Trump 2.0's restrictive policies, while immensely challenging should also be seen as a catalyst for global innovation, with India poised to emerge as a leading actor. Leveraging its tech prowess, manufacturing potential and through educational reforms, India can envisage turning these curbs into opportunities which will strengthen its economic and strategic standing. This article is authored by Sriparna Pathak, professor, China Studies and International Relations, Jindal School of International Affairs, OP Jindal Global University, Sonipat.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
US tariff spike hits China's small parcels, squeezing exporters
US tariff hikes on small packages from China triggered a slump in shipments last month, contributing to a huge drop in bilateral trade and roiling exporters like Shein Group Ltd . The value of small parcels sent from China to the US fell to just over USD 1 billion in May, the least since early 2023, according to customs data released Friday. The 40 per cent plunge from the same month last year marks a sharp reversal for a booming trade route, coming just as the US government eliminated a long-standing tariff loophole. The policy shift is upending the business models of fast-fashion titan Shein and its rival Temu, which relied on the exemption to send goods directly to US customers free of tariffs. It's also squeezing thousands of small merchants who relied on the model as a low-cost entry into the world's largest consumer market. 'Without the exemption, it would mean tougher business to us, and much fewer options for consumers, and potentially higher prices,' said Wang Yuhao, whose Kunming-based incense company, Shantivale, recently began selling to the US. 'This is a lose-lose situation.' For the entrepreneur, the new tariffs and logistical fees of direct shipping now would mean losing USD 2 on every parcel. To avoid the additional cost, Wang said he has pivoted to bulk shipments to US warehouses, a move that demanded an upfront investment of more than 100,000 yuan (USD 13,800) for inventory and storage. The source of the disruption is the end of the 'de minimis' rule exemption for Chinese and Hong Kong shipments. Previously, packages valued under USD 800 could enter the US duty-free. Since May 2, those parcels face tariffs as high as 54 per cent after the Trump administration moved to close what it deemed an unfair trade loophole. The impact on the largest players was swift. Shein raised US prices on items from dresses to kitchenware ahead of the hike to cover the costs of the higher tariffs, according to data compiled by Bloomberg News. In the week after the tariffs took effect, both Shein and Temu saw double-digit sales declines, an early sign the punitive measures are eroding their popularity. Even with the drop, the US remained the largest single destination for China's small parcels, the data showed. Malaysia followed by taking more than USD 700 million worth of such shipments last month. Globally, small parcel shipments rose 40 per cent in May compared to a year ago, with Belgium, South Korea, Hong Kong and Hungary among other large destinations.
