First Ukraine, Now Israel: Drone smuggling is potent new war weapon
Small, difficult to detect and able to pack a powerful punch, attack drones have become a formidable weapon in
modern warfare
. But when launched from deep inside enemy territory -- as in Iran and in Russia this month -- their impact is all the more devastating.
The surprise factor of having to fend off drones attacking from within combines a classic military strategy with modern technology. Spy craft and
covert operations
have long been a part of combat, but using them to build or deploy deadly drones behind enemy lines is a new tactic in the ever-evolving art of war, officials and weapons experts said.
That was the case two weeks ago, when more than 40 Russian war planes were hit by a swarm of 117 drones that Ukraine had secretly planted near military bases in Russia months earlier. Some were thousands of miles from Ukraine.
It was also the case in Iran, which lost missiles, interceptors and air defense systems that were destroyed Friday by drones and other weapons that Israeli intelligence operatives had smuggled in earlier.
Many details about the secretive operations and how they were carried out remain murky to protect methods of intelligence collection and sources of covert information.
Live Events
But Israel's approach gave it an edge in its wide-ranging attack against Iran "because it's coming from left flank," said Assaf Orion, a retired Israeli brigadier general and defense strategist at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
"This means that Iran not only has to look west, to see what's coming, but it also needs to look inside," Orion said.
The Israeli clandestine mission was the product of years of work, Israeli officials have said. That included commando operations inside Iran's capital, Tehran, which was hit hard Friday, including explosions that struck residential buildings.
Experts believed that at least some of the drones used in the overall attack were quadcopters, with four propellers, including some that were relatively small but able to carry bombs or other weapons.
"One of the things that created was, of course, surprise," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a national address Friday night. "I told President Trump when we spoke, 'Surprise is the essence of success.'"
Netanyahu compared the covert attack to another by Israel, last September in Lebanon, where pagers and walkie-talkies filled with explosives targeted Hezbollah. That operation was also cited by intelligence experts in early June, after Ukraine's surprise strike in Russia, as an example of how technology is rapidly changing the way wars are fought.
But at the heart of all three military missions -- in Lebanon, Russia and now Iran -- is the painstaking and often fruitless effort of intelligence gathering. Such operations can take years and are fraught with danger.
"At the end of the day, the drones are just instruments, and the way they can be used comes down to your sophistication and your creativity," said Farzan Sabet, an analyst of Iran and weapons systems at the Geneva Graduate Institute in Switzerland. "So it's a natural evolution; this is just a taste of what's to come."
Drones may become an especially attractive weapon in covert operations, Sabet said, if they can be smuggled into enemy territory in parts and over time, making them even more difficult to detect.
As drone warfare evolves, so will ways to counter it. That could include low-tech solutions, like shielding military equipment and other targets with hardened covers, or more advanced systems that shoot down drones, either with a weapon or by jamming them.
Sabet said Iran has been developing a multilayered air defense system with a "360-degree perspective of threats coming in" that, if operational, should have been able to detect incoming attacks from high in the atmosphere, like a ballistic missile, or from a drone launched from a few kilometers away. Why that did not happen Friday is not clear.
But the similarities between the drone-smuggling operations by Israel and Ukraine suggest that such tactics will be copied in other conflicts -- at least until newer, stealthier or more powerful war-fighting strategies are developed.
"The technology is impressive in both the operations by Ukraine and in the case of Israel; it's pushing the boundaries of the novel uses of this technology," Sabet said. "But for me, the human intelligence side of it, that's more incredible."
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Kremlin declines to predict when Putin and Trump may meet
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Friday he could not predict whether Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet with US President Donald Trump this year. Peskov told reporters that Russia hopes to agree with the United States soon on a new round of negotiations to remove 'irritants' in bilateral ties.
Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Israel-Iran conflict: Day after Israeli attack, nuclear watchdog confirms damages to key under-construction reactor near Tehran
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IEAE) has confirmed that Israel's strikes on Friday resulted in damages to key buildings at the partially constructed Khondab (formerly known as Arak) Heavy Water Production Plant including its distillation unit. The nuclear watchdog's statement comes a day after the global body said no damages were 'initially visible'. 'While damage to the nearby Heavy Water Production Plant was initially not visible, it is now assessed that key buildings at the facility were damaged, including the distillation unit,' the IEAE's latest statement on 'Updates on developments in Iran' said. No damage has been observed at Iran's other nuclear sites so far, it added. No radiological consequence was expected, IEAE's Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said. This has been attributed to the reactor not being operational and not containing any nuclear material. 'There is a lot of nuclear material in Iran in different places, which means that the potential for a radiological accident with the dispersion in the atmosphere of radioactive materials and particles does exist,' he added, stressing on the possible nuclear safety risks. IAEA, in its statement, also sought to receive timely and regular technical information about the nuclear facilities and their respective sites in the country. 'This information is needed to promptly inform the international community and ensure an effective response and assistance to any emergency situation in Iran,' Director General Grossi said. He added that the agency was also in constant contact with other countries in the region amid the ongoing tensions in the Middle East. The Khondab reactor was hit on Thursday (June 19) as the both Israel and Iran continued to trade strikes on the seventh day of the conflict. The Israeli strikea also damaged the nearby plant that makes heavy water. Heavy-water reactors can be used to produce plutonium which, like enriched uranium, can be used to make an atom bomb. So far, Israel has announced that its attacks have hit prominent Iranian nuclear sites in Natanz, Isfahan, Arak and Tehran itself. With AP inputs
NDTV
44 minutes ago
- NDTV
Why "Two Weeks" Is Donald Trump's Favourite Unit Of Time
New Delhi: For US President Donald Trump, the phrase "two weeks" has emerged over time as a fixture in his speeches and policy-making. Its latest deployment came during a routine White House briefing this Thursday, where press secretary Karoline Leavitt announced that Mr. Trump would determine "within the next two weeks" whether to launch a military strike on Iran. "I have a message directly from the president, and I quote," Ms Leavitt said. "'Based on the fact that there is a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.'" This is not the first time Mr Trump has used the "two weeks" timeframe. When asked about his confidence in Russian President Vladimir Putin eight weeks ago, Mr Trump replied, "I'll let you know in about two weeks." When questioned about the details of a new tax plan during his re-election campaign, the answer was: "Two weeks." The timeline for a long-promised infrastructure package? "We're going to have something in two weeks." From the situation in the Middle East to claims about election fraud evidence, all passed through the same timeframe: two weeks. Over the past week, Israel has acknowledged strikes on Natanz, Isfahan, Karaj, and Tehran, describing the campaign as a preemptive measure to degrade Iran's nuclear capabilities and prevent any progress toward weaponisation. The ongoing crisis in the Middle East has put the entire region on edge, with all eyes focused on what Trump's move would be.
