UK sanctions two Israeli ministers as it ramps up pressure over Gaza
Mr Ben-Gvir, the security minister, and Mr Smotrich, the finance minister in Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition government will both face a travel ban and see their assets frozen.
The move comes as the UK and other Western nations seek to ramp up pressure on Israel's government amid the ongoing war in Gaza.
Israel's foreign affairs minister Gideon Sa'ar said it was 'outrageous that elected representatives and members of the government are subjected to these kind of measures'.
He added: 'I discussed it earlier today with PM Netanyahu and we will hold a special government meeting early next week to decide on our response to this unacceptable decision.'
Mr Smotrich and Mr Ben-Gvir both belong to right wing parties which help to prop up Mr Netanyahu's fragile coalition government.
Both have been criticised for their hardline stance on the war in Gaza.
Foreign Secretary David Lammy paused negotiations towards a UK trade deal with Israel in May (Carlos Jasso/PA)
Mr Smotrich has campaigned against allowing aid into Gaza, while Mr Ben-Gvir has called for Gaza's people to be resettled from the territory.
The UK and its allies have increased pressure on Israel in recent months amid ongoing aid shortages in Gaza, as well as suggestions it could launch a new large-scale offensive into the territory.
Reports suggest only scarce amounts of aid are making their way into the hands of Gazans, amid a new aid initiative backed by the US and Israel, instead of the previous UN-run programme.
The slow flow of food and medicines has prompted warnings of famine and starvation among the territory's population.
In May, Foreign Secretary David Lammy paused negotiations towards a UK trade deal with Israel as the Government sought to pressure Israel to abandon its planned offensive into Gaza.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, France's president Emmanuel Macron and Canada's prime minister Mark Carney also wrote a joint statement last month warning that Israel's leaders risked 'breaching International Humanitarian Law', and calling for more aid to be allowed into Gaza.
Mr Netanyahu responded by claiming the three leaders were on the 'wrong side' of history.
In September last year, the Government halted 30 out of around 350 arms sales licences to Israel, for fear they may be used for war crimes.
Ministers insist that this means F-35 fighter jets used by Israel no longer receive replacement parts from the UK, and no UK-made bombs or ammunition are used in Gaza.
Lord David Cameron has previously said he considered sanctioning both Israeli ministers in his final days as foreign secretary in Rishi Sunak's Conservative government.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
13 minutes ago
- The National
David Lammy refuses to say if US Iran strikes were illegal
The US attacked three sites in Iran at the weekend, inserting itself into Israel's war aimed at destroying the country's nuclear programme. Asked about the lawfulness of the strikes on Monday, the Foreign Secretary told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that as the UK was "not involved" it was "for the Americans to discuss those issues". It was put to him that the UK Government had a firm view on whether Russia attacking Ukraine was legal, which he said was not a 'moral equivalence'. READ MORE: Kenny MacAskill: Donald Trump bombing Iran is illegal and insane He said: 'There isn't a moral equivalence here'. He added it had been "crystal clear' that Moscow invaded a sovereign nation. When it was put to him that it was extraordinary he could not answer the question as critics argue Iran is also a sovereign nation which was attacked without warning, he said: 'I don't think it is extraordinary because this was not the UK's action, we were not involved, we were clear when this began and Israel's attacks began that we were not involved… so I don't say it's not legitimate, but I can tell you as Foreign Secretary that we were not involved.' Lammy added that Iran has to 'get serious about the off-ramp that is being made available to them' and that 'ultimately this can only be dealt with in diplomacy.' (Image: Kin Cheung) The Foreign Secretary said Donald Trump's action 'may well have set back Iran several years', and enrichment of uranium at 60% cannot be allowed to 'slide'. Trump has floated the possibility of leadership change in Iran, hours after his team said replacing the Iranian government was not the aim of US attacks. Iran's military has vowed a "decisive response" after Trump said US strikes caused "monumental damage" to Iranian nuclear sites. The UN's nuclear watchdog has called for a ceasefire in order to inspect the damage. Asked about Trump's posts on Truth Social about regime change in Tehran, Lammy said: 'There will be further tweets on many issues over the next three-and-a-half years of Donald Trump's leadership that you will be discussing… the rhetoric is strong but actually I can tell you, having spoken to the Secretary of State, having sat in the White House, that this is targeted action to deal with Iran's nuclear capability.' READ MORE: UK providing 'political cover' for US and Israel after Iran attack He added: 'I'm very conscious that when I met colleagues in the White House on Thursday that they were considering all of the options… we knew that, you knew that as journalists. And Donald Trump made a decision to act to degrade that capability. "It may well have set back Iran by several years. That was a decision that he took.' Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Iran's nuclear programme is a 'grave threat' which the US military action would 'alleviate'. He has been accused of providing "political cover" for Israel and the US. The US attacked three sites in Iran including the Fordo facility, which is buried deep underground. In an address to the nation from the White House, Trump warned there could be further strikes if Iran retaliates. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi warned the attacks 'will have everlasting consequences' and that Tehran 'reserves all options' to retaliate.
Daily Mirror
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Safest places to live in UK in nuclear attack as expert issues dire warning
Following US attacks on three nuclear sites in Iran, fears over escalating nuclear conflict are being felt across the globe, including the UK. And many have expressed concerns over where exactly would be safest, in the event of a catastrophe closer to home. Iran 's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, has warned there will be "everlasting consequences" following US President Donald Trump's confirmation that "great American Warriors" had carried out a "very successful attack" on the sites of Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Taking to social media platform X, Mr Araghchi wrote: "Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behaviour. In accordance with the UN Charter and its provisions allowing a legitimate response in self-defence, Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interests, and people." And as fears over the potential for "World War III" continue to rumble, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has issued the following statement: "Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon, and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat. "The situation in the Middle East remains volatile, and stability in the region is a priority. We call on Iran to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis." Here, the Mirror looks at the safest places to live in the UK, should the worst come to pass. According to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP): "The best way to protect you and your family before, during, and after a nuclear blast is getting inside the centre of a building or basement. On August 6, 1945, Mr Eizo Nomura was in the basement of a building in Hiroshima, about 170 meters from ground zero. He survived the atomic bombing and died in 1982 at the age of 84. Most people within a few hundred metres of a nuclear detonation are not likely to survive, especially if unprepared. "Be inside before the fallout arrives. After a detonation, you will have 10 minutes or more to find an adequate shelter before fallout arrives. If a multi-story building or a basement can be safely reached within a few minutes of the explosion, go there immediately. The safest buildings have brick or concrete walls. Underground parking garages and subways can also provide good shelter." With this in mind, many would automatically assume that London, with its vast underground network, would be the safest location, with the tube tunnels allowing citizens some protection from the blast. This is, of course, where many Londoners sought refuge during the dark days of the Blitz. However, there are mixed opinions on this front with experts fearing that modern nuclear weapons could penetrate much further than the bombs of World War II, meaning even the 58-metre-deep Hampstead station may still be too close to the surface. Andrew Futter, a Professor of International Politics at the University of Leicester, previously advised My London that the Underground "probably wouldn't be deep enough if there was a direct hit". Therefore, in the event that a nation targets one of the UK's major cities - from London to Edinburgh - Brits would need to be outside of the blast zone to have the best chance of survival. When it comes to the reach of nuclear blasts, there are several factors to bear in mind including a radiation radius of 153 km2, a fireball radius of approximately 197 km2, an air blast radius between 321 km2 and 1,420 km2 and a thermal radiation radius of 12,960 km2. Although these distances can vary depending on weather conditions, property researchers have previously put together a list of places which should be safer than the cities. These 20 locations, listed by property portal EMoov back in 2017, are outside of the immediate range of blasts on major cities... Cornwall Weymouth Folkestone Dover Margate Clacton-on-Sea Felixstowe Brixworth Bideford Aberystwyth Skegness Isle of Anglesey Barrow in Furness Lancaster Whitby Carlisle Dumfries Berwick-upon-Tweed Inverness However, some of these areas are still close enough to blast sites to be affected by radiation swept over by winds. Therefore, the remote island Foula, on the Shetland Isles, could well be the safest place in the UK in this instance.
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Crystal Palace's Europa League prospects improve after John Textor sells stake
Textor's shares in Palace threatened to be an obstacle to their participation in the Europa League next season because the American is also a shareholder in French side Lyon, who are set to enter the same competition. Under UEFA multi-club ownership rules, it looked as though Palace would miss out. However, the PA news agency understands from sources close to Palace that Textor's 45 per cent stake in the London club has now been sold to New York Jets owner Woody Johnson. Palace qualified for the Europa League thanks to their FA Cup final win over Manchester City last month (Nick Potts/PA) Reports have placed the price between £160m and £190m. The sale is subject to Premier League approval, but may now free Palace up to play in the Europa League. The Eagles qualified thanks to their FA Cup final victory over Manchester City last month. Textor, who through his Eagle Football Holdings group also owns a significant stake in Brazilian side Botafogo, initially invested in Palace in 2021. Palace declined to comment. Eagle Football Holdings and UEFA have both been approached for comment. PA understands a decision regarding Palace's participation is expected from UEFA before the end of June.
