How a Film Critic Was Lured Back to Literature

For more than 20 years, A.O. Scott, who was until recently a co-chief film critic for The New York Times, had a routine.
Look at the movies he'd been assigned to review for the week. Go to a screening. File a review the next morning. Rinse. Repeat.
But now, since pivoting to a role as a critic at large for The Times Book Review in 2023, Mr. Scott, 58, has been able to step back from the deadline grind and focus on his passions: Rereading classic novels. Defending bad commencement speeches. Demystifying poetry.
Since last November, Mr. Scott, who has a bachelor's degree in literature from Harvard University, has written a popular monthly column that scrutinizes a single poem, examining it line by line. He recently expanded the exercise into a weeklong challenge, in which readers were asked to memorize a poem as a way to soothe their nerves or 'grant a moment of simple happiness,' Mr. Scott wrote.
'I do think that it is something that people want, and in a way, something that we've maybe helped them discover that they want,' Mr. Scott said in a recent interview in the Book Review office, where Stephen King's 'Holly' and Samantha Harvey's 'Orbital' sit on a bookshelf behind him.
In an hourlong conversation, Mr. Scott outlined his goals for his new beat and why he thinks readers enjoy being asked to slow down and spend time with a piece of writing. These are edited excerpts from the conversation.
Did you ever think you'd write such a popular column about poetry?
When I moved to the Book Review, the idea was to do essays and reviews on various literary topics. I never would have guessed that poetry would have been a big part of it. But when we started doing these interactive pieces about short poems that were brief but intensive, people responded with great enthusiasm. And they kept saying, 'Can you do more of this?' It's an experimental approach to criticism. We kind of make it up as we go along.
Why did you want to return to writing about books?
I'd always liked writing about literature, and I did want to get back to that. But I also wanted to see if there were formats and approaches that I could work on other than a review. Most of what I did as a film critic was review new movies, which was a lot of fun, but also came to feel like a treadmill. It was hundreds and hundreds of pieces a year, and weekly deadlines.
What does a day look like for you now?
I spend a lot of time reading poems, which is heaven. A lot of the work involved in my poetry pieces is about finding the right ones. The poems have to be short enough — and skinny enough — so you can read them on your phone. They can't be too difficult, but they need a little bit of work or interpretation. Also, now that my beat is books, I'm just trying to keep up and catch up, as I did with movies.
What are you reading right now?
I have a lot of books piled up. There's a gigantic new Mark Twain biography — it's more than 1,000 pages long. And then I'm following the 'Great Gatsby' project with other 100-year-old books. The next one I want to do is 'Mrs. Dalloway' by Virginia Woolf, which was also published in 1925, so I've been rereading that and reading pieces about the book.
How had the literary world changed since you left it?
It's like walking into your old neighborhood and seeing that it hasn't changed all that much. Some of the storefronts are different, but the landmarks are all there. And there's still always too much to read. I mean, if I thought it was hard to stay caught up with movies, with books — which have been around for thousands of years more, and which are published in much greater quantities — I give up on the idea.
Did you always love poetry?
Like a lot of people, I got into it through popular music: in my case, listening to Bob Dylan, and being interested in what he was doing as a songwriter and a lyricist. As a teenager, I started reading poems, and sometimes tried to write poems. Even when I was reviewing movies for all those years, I was reading poetry almost every day.
How did it influence your film reviews?
As a writer, you're always looking for interesting examples of language as a way of refreshing your own relationship to the language. So I certainly read a lot of other critics, but sometimes I would feel like, 'I need another idea of what writing can be, of the possibilities of the English language.' Poetry is a great source of that, because it's an approach to writing and the language that's certainly different from journalism or criticism. It can remind you of just how much possibility, how much play there is when you're writing.
You've gotten America hooked on poetry through your column. Why do you think such a decidedly analogue experience has resonated with so many people?
There's a desire to reclaim and remaster your own attention. I also think we're so conditioned to think that everything needs to be productive, or to have a use or an application, that we cheat ourselves out of a certain amount of aesthetic experience. So I think if people are invited to spend two minutes reading a poem, and let themselves feel it without worrying about how they're supposed to think about it, or how it will count in their life — they'll embrace that.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

39 minutes ago

• Yahoo

In the Arena: Serena Williams review – there is just no one in the world that matches up to her (and her sister)

Serena Williams, holder of 39 grand slam titles and four Olympic gold medals, who spent 319 weeks as tennis's world No 1 and became the highest-earning female athlete in history, never thought she was that good when she was a young player. That was because she was always training against her older sister, Venus ('she was the prodigy of prodigies'), the only person in the world who could really challenge her. A year younger, Serena remembers being shorter and weaker and resorting to cheating on line calls at practice so she could occasionally beat her. In the Arena: Serena Williams (the title comes from President Roosevelt's 1910 speech to the Sorbonne – 'It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena' so, yes, consider me told) is an eight-part docuseries that covers Serena's rise and rise over her 27-year tennis career before she retired three years ago. Since then, incidentally, she has been busy with her venture capital firm, production company, body care and pain relief startup, beauty line and raising two children. Honestly, it's like looking in a mirror, is it not? Advertisement In the Arena was executive produced by Serena and is clearly meant to be the definitive version of events. It would be too strong to call it hagiographic, but it is a full-blooded celebration of her achievements. It is not the place to come if you want, for example, an interrogation of the techniques used by the sisters' astonishing father and coach, Richard Williams, to mould two champions. 'My dad was a marketing genius,' says Serena of his marshalling of press attention round his children in the early years, regardless, some might say and have said, of the psychological impact. 'There's a very thin line between parent and coach … But I would say at the end it was all worth it,' is as far as Serena goes here in acknowledging the criticism Richard has faced for his intense focus on their professional success. Then it's on to the good stuff. The sisters turning pro – Venus flying from the start, Serena stumbling slightly before she too took off. The beating of rivals and established stars ('I was determined, determined to take her down … I'm coming for you. I'm coming for everyone') and their swift domination of a game that had hitherto been almost solely the preserve of a white, moneyed elite. 'Little sisters from Compton. Can't really take that too seriously, right?' Inevitably, of course, they begin to meet in grand slam finals. The footage – the grace, the power of them – is astonishing. Almost as astonishing, if in a gradually emerging way, is the grace with which they handle the competition between them, the wins and the losses. Serena talks about benefiting from Venus going first in everything, from turning pro, to handling good and bad press, to playing individuals Serena will later face in tournaments. They talk with sincerity about being pleased for each other's wins even as they mourn and analyse their own losses. And they talk about the bifurcation between life as sisters and life as absolutely dedicated competitors and not letting either one infect the other. They warmed up together before their first joint grand slam final, the 2001 US Open. Venus won. 'I can't say I enjoyed it. I did what I had to do.' 'I wasn't happy,' adds Serena. 'But I was OK. She was the phenom. It was never me.' Her turn would come. She learned to pretend she was playing someone else when it was Venus on the other side of the net. By the time Wimbledon rolled round a year later, she was ready to be No 1. 'I gotta have it,' Serena grins, remembering. 'That's what I need in my life. Because it's just an extension of who I was. As Thanos says: I was inevitable. I couldn't stop the roll.' Advertisement Nor could anyone – including the haters behind the racial and misogynist abuse she dealt with – or anything, including the difficult birth of her first child, in 2017, which nearly killed her. She retired in 2022, and plunged straight into what is already a highly successful and lucrative second act. It would be fascinating to compare and contrast another pair of sisters or – perhaps even more fascinatingly – a pair of brothers who followed the same trajectory. Would they have stayed so close, maintained the same boundaries between love and work, or would they have disappeared under the pressure of competition? Would they have spurred each other on to greater heights in the same way, or destroyed each other? Would they remain such generous supporters of each other, or have combusted by now? What makes the mind not just of a champion – but of a champion who survives the ride intact? Maybe one day we'll find out. But there is as yet nothing to compare to Serena or to Venus separately, let alone together. • In the Arena: Serena Williams airs on BBC One and is on iPlayer now

CBS News

39 minutes ago

• CBS News

Kids battling cancer enjoy Hollywood movie experience thanks to Michigan nonprofit

A Michigan-based nonprofit rolled out the red carpet for kids undergoing cancer treatment and their families on Saturday afternoon. The Bottomless Toy Chest hosted its 12th annual movie event. Nothing says Hollywood movie experience more than a private screening of the new movie Elio at Emagine Theater in Royal Oak, Michigan. "It brings them hope. It brings them joy and then healing in all the same moments," Stephanie Zinser, Matthew and Ignacio's mother, said. As 11-year-old Mathew Zinser walked through the door, he was greeted by cheering fans and paparazzi. Matthew Zinser is still recovering from a bone marrow transplant two years ago. He and his 8-year-old brother Ignacio Zinser both have a rare genetic disorder called Shwachman-Diamond syndrome, which can develop into leukemia. They spend a lot of time at the hospital, away from their other six siblings, getting treatment. "When you're going through a treatment, it separates the family at times, and this is a great event to bring them together to celebrate something that they don't have on a daily basis," Stephanie Zinser said. After the movie, attendees got to enjoy some pizza, crafts and cookie decorating, all thanks to the nonprofit. "Our mission is to promote a positive state of mind in children who are going through very difficult treatment by providing them with empowering toy experiences that help them stay focused, stay comfortable, and, you know, have a sense of normalcy during a very difficult time in their lives," Micky Guisewite, founder & executive director of the Bottomless Toy Chest, said. While Ignacio loved Elio and the lesson he learned, his favorite part of the day was spending time with his family. "Because you get to be with your family, and you get to just enjoy being with your family," Ignacio Zinser said. And that's what makes moments like this special. The Bottomless Toy Chest serves children in 15 hospitals and clinics throughout Michigan. It has expanded to 15 other states. This year, the nonprofit says it will give out more than 35,000 toys.

Yahoo

43 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Video: Mariya Agapova kisses Jessica Eye on the mouth during BKFC faceoff

Two former UFC fighters shared a kiss during BKFC 76 pre-fight faceoffs, though one was not happy. While fighters occasionally get physical during their final opportunity to mean-mug their opponent, it's not usually in the way Mariya Agapova did it Friday when she kissed Jessica Eye on the mouth. Advertisement Eye was not a consenting party in the lip-locking. She appeared caught off guard by the action and vented some frustration toward Agapova moments later. The maneuver could add an additional layer of heat to Saturday's matchup, which takes place on the main card at Dickies Arena in Fort Worth, Texas. This article originally appeared on MMA Junkie: Video: Former UFC fighters unexpectedly kiss during BKFC 76 faceoff