RBI winds down offshore currency tool reflecting shift in strategy

By Subhadip Sircar and Bhaskar Dutta
India's central bank has scaled back its use of a key tool it deployed last year to counter the strong dollar, according to people familiar with the matter, reflecting a change in the authority's intervention strategy under its new leadership.
The Reserve Bank of India 's short dollar positions in the non-deliverable forwards market have fallen sharply to below $5 billion, down from a peak of about $70 billion late last year, the people said, asking not to be named discussing private matters.
The central bank had relied heavily on these offshore contracts in 2024 as the dollar surged, driven by a strong US economy and Donald Trump's presidential win. However, this year, the rupee has moved more freely against the greenback, suggesting a shift toward a more hands-off approach to currency management amid global trade uncertainty.
'A central bank cannot keep increasing its short forward book without losing the efficacy of this tool. So to prepare for further volatile events, the RBI will reduce its forward book substantially, if not completely,' said Dhiraj Nim, currency strategist at Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd.
An email sent to the RBI seeking comment on the matter didn't immediately receive a response.
Using offshore non-deliverable forwards has a number of advantages for central banks, including potentially lower costs and the fact that they don't drain official reserves. That's because the NDF contracts allow the central bank to influence the rupee's levels without actually selling large amounts of dollars. Such interventions can also act as a signal of intent in the spot market, thus boosting the rupee when markets are volatile.
The RBI's heavy reliance on the offshore market last year was in sharp contrast to its usual practice of curbing swings in the rupee onshore. Under Governor Sanjay Malhotra, who took office in December, the central bank has brought a large portion of its derivatives intervention to the local market.
The reduction in the offshore exposure accounts for most of the recent drop in the RBI's overall forward dollar positions, the people said. As of April, the total forward book — covering both local and offshore markets — stood at about $73 billion, down from a record $88.8 billion in February. More than half the book was within the 3-month to 1-year maturity bucket, indicating a large portion of the book had been brought onshore.
However, the RBI isn't worried about the potential drain on its reserves from these dollar sales. 'We are not unduly concerned about that,' Governor Malhotra told reporters on Friday after cutting interest rates for a third straight meeting. 'If there are opportunities, we can build reserves.'
India's foreign exchange reserves have rebounded to $692 billion, nearing the record high of $705 billion hit in September. Still, the RBI will likely need to continue adding to its reserves over the next three months to cushion any impact of $14.7 billion in maturing short positions through July, Nomura Holdings Inc. analysts wrote in a note.
More than two-thirds of the contracts in the overall forwards book were in the three months to one-year bucket and are unlikely to be rolled over, according to DBS Bank Ltd.
The RBI's unexpected decision to cut banks' cash reserve ratio and free up ₹2.5 trillion in liquidity was also aimed at offsetting likely liquidity strain from unwinding short positions, according to the lender. When the RBI sells dollars to banks, it absorbs rupees, potentially tightening financial conditions.
'Liquidity infusion via the CRR cut would also aid this process and ensure it is non-disruptive, while shielding the currency,' said Radhika Rao, senior economist at DBS Bank.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Economic Times

an hour ago

• Economic Times

Rupee gains 14 paise on Trump hint of no Iran action for now, equity flows

The Indian rupee edged higher to 86.58 per dollar on Friday, marking its first gain in six sessions, fueled by inflows into domestic equities. This appreciation occurred despite high crude oil prices and ongoing tensions between Israel and Iran. Market sentiment was buoyed by signals from US President Trump suggesting a delay in action against Iran. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Indian rupee modestly strengthened Friday, its first advance in six days tracking inflows into domestic equities, to close at 86.58 per dollar. The rupee climbed 14 paise despite volatile oil prices and no immediate signs of a truce in the Israel-Iran strength in the rupee came after US President Donald Trump signalled to avoid any precipitate action on Iran. Rebalancing of the FTSE Russell index also led to some flows, traders said. The rupee traded between 86.54 and 86.67 to the dollar on Friday. Brent crude oil prices remained elevated at $77 per barrel, while the dollar index was at 98. A rise in crude oil prices is detrimental to inflation in India as the country is a large importer of the commodity. "Chances of rupee strengthening are very low while crude oil prices are this high. The gain we have seen today is all because of Trump's comments to postpone strikes on Iran," said Anil Bhansali, head of treasury at Finrex Treasury Reserve Bank of India was likely absent today and did not intervene, traders said."The rebalancing flows of the FTSE Russell Index did help, but dollar demand was strong too, which countered the inflow," a trader said. Foreign investors bought Indian equities worth ₹7,940.7 crore on Friday."The only positive we have seen is that FPIs are not large sellers in Indian equities," Bhansali said.

Time of India

2 hours ago

• Time of India

BMC plan to auction prime plots stalled as two govt bodies want to procure them

Mumbai: Eight months after BMC floated tenders to auction three prime land parcels in Mumbai—at Malabar Hill, Worli, and near Crawford market in Fort—the fate of the proposed sale remains uncertain. The move had marked the first time the civic body opted to auction its own plots, indicating a shift in its strategy to monetise real estate assets and generate long-term revenue. However, the auction process faced multiple hurdles. The plan to auction the Malabar Hill plot was scrapped early on following objections from BEST as the land has high-tension transmission lines running through it. Additionally, over 60 residents from the area raised objections, pointing out that the property card of the plot classifies it as a BMC-owned space designated for a public garden. The civic body then proceeded with plans to auction the remaining two plots. These vacant land parcels are to be leased for 30 years, with a provision for renewal for another 30 years, and are expected to bring in substantial revenue for BMC. However, an official said, Central Railway requested a portion of the plot near Crawford market—for free—to construct a passenger outlet from CSMT via a proposed skywalk. "Since the entire plot was listed for auction, carving out a part of it may not be viable," said a civic official. A high-level meeting on the matter was recently held with the chief secretary, the official added. As for the Worli plot, RBI approached BMC independently, although it did not participate in the bidding process. TOI reached out to RBI for comments but got no response. BMC officials confirmed that while bids were received for the Worli land, the responses are still under review. In Oct last year, when the tender was issued a few days before the model code of conduct for the assembly elections kicked in, Shiv Sena (UBT) leader and MLA Aaditya Thackeray opposed the auctions, claiming that BMC is gradually losing control of vital land resources, which could otherwise be used for public infrastructure or amenities.

Time of India

4 hours ago

• Time of India

Credit rating firms seek govt intervention over regulatory void on ₹1 L cr unlisted debt

Mumbai: Credit rating companies have sought the intervention of ministries of corporate affairs and finance amid an uncertainty over the future ratings of more ₹1 lakh crore of unlisted securities . The rating of these instruments, like corporate bonds and securitised papers, which comprise an integral part of the financial market for debts, has fallen between the cracks of two regulatory authorities. The ambiguity stems from the fact that the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), the primary regulator for the credit rating agencies (CRAs), has jurisdiction over only listed securities while unlisted debts raised by corporates, including company fixed deposits, are outside the domain of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). SEBI had last year told rating firms to get a non-objection certificate from RBI for rating the unlisted papers. Since then, the central bank has allowed CRAs to rate certificates of deposits (CDs) - instruments floated by banks to raise short-term funds. But, there is no clarity on ratings of securitised papers like pass through certificates (PTCs) and unlisted corporate bonds . This is where CRAs want the ministries to step in. Issued against a basket of loans and the interest flows from them, PTCs enable lenders like non-bank finance companies as well as banks to convert relatively illiquid loans into marketable papers and create headroom to lend more while letting investors - like corporate treasuries, financial institutions, and fund houses - hold a diversified pool of assets and sometimes generate a higher return. A predominant portion of the outstanding PTCs are unlisted. Under the circumstances, the CRAs are awaiting a signal from the corporate affairs ministry that they can follow the SEBI guidelines on listed securities while carrying out the rating of unlisted securities. Thus, CRAs want to know whether they can continue to use the same rules of default recognition, application of grading scale, disclosures, and issue of press release for unlisted papers as well. The ministry is yet to respond to the letter from the rating industry body. With New Delhi is yet to give the go-ahead, some of the CRAs, in the course of various meetings, have sensitised issuers of unlisted securities as well as some of the investors that ratings of these instruments may have to be withdrawn in the absence of any clarity from the government or regulators. "More so, with SEBI reminding CRAs a few months ago that the issue needs to be sorted out. This could well be a nudge from SEBI to list more securities and thereby promote transparency. However, many issuers refrain from listing either to avoid the compliance and reporting that come with it or strike bilateral deals with investors and do not feel the urgency to list," said an industry official. Many institutional investors may keep away from unrated securities, including banks who save on capital as unrated loans and investments carry higher risk weights. But while there are takers for unrated instruments, rating helps in investment decision making by capturing the risk and pricing of an instrument. "Some are expecting RBI to clear the air for PTCs which are mostly issued by NBFCs (entities regulated by RBI). If RBI gives a green signal for PTCs, then the issue related to rating of unlisted corporate bonds has to be resolved. Company FDs are a small market," said another official. Earnings from ratings of unlisted papers, said an analyst, is a small slice of CRAs' earnings, but a lack of rating can have some implications for the wholesale debt market. For instance, CRAs' periodic reports on the PTC market are closely tracked by investors. "There are adequate regulations on investments in these unlisted securities but there is not enough regulation about their rating. SEBI understandably wants rating of any instrument to be cleared by some authority. It doesn't want to be blamed for a big loss or default which inevitably raises questions on ratings," said the person. "The market too is evolving. The assets of Alternative investment funds have surged in the last 5 to 6 years and many of these funds put money in unlisted papers," she said. Earlier, CRAs could choose on what it would rate, but those days are long over with the role and rules agencies coming under scrutiny since the IL&FS default in 2018.